Literature DB >> 15321697

Suppression of paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias--results of the SOPAT trial.

Monica Patten1, Renke Maas, Peter Bauer, Berndt Lüderitz, Frank Sonntag, Miroslaw Dluzniewski, Robert Hatala, Grzegorz Opolski, Hans-Walter Müller, Thomas Meinertz.   

Abstract

AIM: The indication to treat paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is controversial. The Suppression of Paroxysmal Atrial Tachyarrhythmias (SOPAT) trial was designed to answer the following questions: (1) What is the average rate of spontaneous events of symptomatic PAF with and without anti-arrhythmic medication? (2) what is the prevalence of severe side-effects? and (3) is the fixed combination of Quinidine + Verapamil inferior to the efficacy of sotalol or not? METHODS AND
RESULTS: Within 60 months 172 centres in Germany, Poland, and The Slovak Republic prospectively enrolled 1033 patients (mean age 60 years, 62% male) with documented frequent episodes of symptomatic PAF. Patients were randomised to either Quinidine + Verapamil 480/240 mg/d (high dose; 263 patients), Quinidine + Verapamil 320/160 mg/d (low dose; 255 patients), Sotalol 320 mg/d (264 patients) or placebo (251 patients), of which 1012 patients entered the intention-to-treat analysis. The primary endpoint was the time to first recurrence of symptomatic PAF or premature discontinuation. Secondary outcome parameters were the total number of symptomatic episodes and tolerability of the tested drugs. Patients were followed for a period of up to 12 months by daily and symptom-triggered trans-telephonic ECG-monitoring (Tele-ECG). The mean time under treatment was 233 +/- 152 days. Regarding the primary endpoint, all active treatments were superior to placebo and not different from each other. A total of 756 patients reached the primary endpoint within 105.7 +/- 8.7 d (mean +/- SEM) in the placebo group, vs. Quinidine + Verapamil (high dose) (150.4 +/- 10 d, p = 0.0061), vs. Quinidine + Verapamil (low dose) (148.9 +/- 10.6 d, p = 0.0006), vs. Sotalol (145.6 +/- 93 d, p = 0.0007). All three treatments were also effective in the reduction of AF burden (days with symptomatic AF [%] mean +/- SD, p vs. placebo): Quinidine + Verapamil (high dose) (3.4 +/- 12, p = 0.0001), Quinidine + Verapamil (low dose) (4.5 +/- 12.3, p = 0.008) and Sotalol (2.9 +/- 6.5, p = 0.026) compared to placebo (6.1 +/- 13.5). A total of four deaths, 13 syncopes, and one ventricular tachycardia (VT) occurred during the active study period, of which one death and one VT were related to Quinidine/Verapamil.
CONCLUSION: Taken together, anti-arrhythmic therapy with the fixed combination of Quinidine + Verapamil is as effective as Sotalol in the reduction of the recurrence rate of symptomatic PAF with a low but definite risk of severe side-effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15321697     DOI: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  21 in total

Review 1.  [New oral anticoagulants: better than vitamin K antagonists?].

Authors:  H Völler; S Alban; D Westermann
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  [Outcome parameters for AF trials--executive summary of an AFNET-EHRA consensus conference].

Authors:  P Kirchhof; A Goette; G Hindricks; S Hohnloser; K-H Kuck; T Meinertz; U Ravens; G Steinbeck; G Breithardt
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2007-12

3.  Surveillance of AF recurrence post-surgical AF ablation using implantable cardiac monitor.

Authors:  John H Ip; Maria Viqar-Syed; Denise Grimes; Yan Xie; Kevin Jager; Jennifer Boak; Divyakant Gandhi
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  [Cardiac workup after cerebral ischemia. Consensus paper of the Working Group on Heart and Brain of the German Cardiac Society and German Stroke Society].

Authors:  U Laufs; U C Hoppe; S Rosenkranz; P Kirchhof; M Böhm; H-C Diener; M Endres; M Grond; W Hacke; T Meinertz; E B Ringelstein; J Röther; M Dichgans
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 5.  Atrial fibrillation and heart failure in the elderly.

Authors:  Pedram Kazemian; Gavin Oudit; Bodh I Jugdutt
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 6.  [ECG telemonitoring].

Authors:  Michael Oeff; Axel Müller; Jörg Neuzner; Stefan Sack; Jörg O Schwab; Dietrich Pfeiffer; Christian Zugck
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-10-25

Review 7.  [Event-recorder].

Authors:  Andreas Schuchert
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-10-25

8.  Diagnostic tools for atrial tachyarrhythmias in implantable pacemakers: a review of technical options and pitfalls.

Authors:  W G de Voogt; N M van Hemel
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Evidence at a glance: error matrix approach for overviewing available evidence.

Authors:  Frederik Keus; Jørn Wetterslev; Christian Gluud; Cornelis J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Angiotensin II antagonist in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (ANTIPAF) trial: rationale and study design.

Authors:  Andreas Goette; Günter Breithardt; Thomas Fetsch; Peter Hanrath; Helmut U Klein; Walter Lehmacher; Gerhard Steinbeck; Thomas Meinertz
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.