Literature DB >> 15320681

Determining the optimal load for jump squats: a review of methods and calculations.

Eric L Dugan1, Tim L A Doyle, Brendan Humphries, Christopher J Hasson, Robert U Newton.   

Abstract

There has been an increasing volume of research focused on the load that elicits maximum power output during jump squats. Because of a lack of standardization for data collection and analysis protocols, results of much of this research are contradictory. The purpose of this paper is to examine why differing methods of data collection and analysis can lead to conflicting results for maximum power and associated optimal load. Six topics relevant to measurement and reporting of maximum power and optimal load are addressed: (a) data collection equipment, (b) inclusion or exclusion of body weight force in calculations of power, (c) free weight versus Smith machine jump squats, (d) reporting of average versus peak power, (e) reporting of load intensity, and (f) instructions given to athletes/ participants. Based on this information, a standardized protocol for data collection and reporting of jump squat power and optimal load is presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15320681     DOI: 10.1519/1533-4287(2004)18<668:DTOLFJ>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  27 in total

1.  A mathematical model of neuromuscular adaptation to resistance training and its application in a computer simulation of accommodating loads.

Authors:  Ognjen Arandjelović
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Possible stimuli for strength and power adaptation: acute mechanical responses.

Authors:  Blair Crewther; John Cronin; Justin Keogh
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Body mass maximizes power output in human jumping: a strength-independent optimum loading behavior.

Authors:  Slobodan Jaric; Goran Markovic
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  A comparison of the kinematics, kinetics and muscle activity between pneumatic and free weight resistance.

Authors:  David Michael Frost; John Barry Cronin; Robert Usher Newton
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  Developing maximal neuromuscular power: part 2 - training considerations for improving maximal power production.

Authors:  Prue Cormie; Michael R McGuigan; Robert U Newton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Predicting vertical jump height from bar velocity.

Authors:  Amador García-Ramos; Igor Štirn; Paulino Padial; Javier Argüelles-Cienfuegos; Blanca De la Fuente; Vojko Strojnik; Belén Feriche
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 7.  Current Methodologies and Implications of Phase Identification of the Vertical Jump: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Neale Eagles; Mark Gregory Leigh Sayers; Matthew Bousson; Dale Ingham Lovell
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  The Optimal Load for Maximal Power Production During Lower-Body Resistance Exercises: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Marco A Soriano; Pedro Jiménez-Reyes; Matthew R Rhea; Pedro J Marín
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 9.  Weightlifting pulling derivatives: rationale for implementation and application.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Paul Comfort; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Reliability and validity assessment of a linear position transducer.

Authors:  Manuel V Garnacho-Castaño; Silvia López-Lastra; José L Maté-Muñoz
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.