| Literature DB >> 15320677 |
William P Ebben1, Alan G Kindler, Kerri A Chirdon, Nina C Jenkins, Aaron J Polichnowski, Alexander V Ng.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of high-load (H-load) periodized resistance training and high-repetition (H-rep) reverse step loading periodized resistance training on endurance performance. Twenty-six female university rowers (age = 20 +/- 1 year) were randomly assigned to H-load (5 novice, 8 varsity) or H-rep (7 novice, 6 varsity) groups. Subjects were pre- and posttested using a 2,000-m rowing ergometer test. Outcome variables included VO2 peak, time to test completion, total power, average power per stroke, total number of strokes, stroke rate, and body mass. Subjects trained for 8 weeks using identical exercises. Varsity rowers who performed H-load training demonstrated greater improvement compared with those who performed H-rep training. Novice rowers who performed H-rep training demonstrated greater improvement compared with those who performed H-load training. High-load periodized training appears to be more effective for athletes with advanced training status, and H-rep reverse step loading periodized training is more effective for those who are relatively untrained.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15320677 DOI: 10.1519/R-12722.1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Strength Cond Res ISSN: 1064-8011 Impact factor: 3.775