Literature DB >> 15320650

Acute creatine monohydrate supplementation: a descriptive physiological profile of responders vs. nonresponders.

Daniel G Syrotuik1, Gordon J Bell.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the physiological profile of responders (>20 mmol.kg(-1) dry weight [dw] increase in total intramuscular creatine monohydrate [Cr] + phosphorylated creatine [PCr]) versus nonresponders (<10 mmol.kg(-1) dw increase) to a 5-day Cr load (0.3 g.kg(-1).d(-1)) in 11 healthy men (mean age = 22.7 years). Pre-post 5-day cellular measures included total resting Cr content (Cr + PCr), fiber type composition, and fiber type cross-sectional area (CSA) determined from muscle biopsies of the vastus lateralis. Body mass, daily dietary intake, 24-hour urine outputs, urinary Cr and creatinine (CrN), and strength performance measures (1 repetition maximum [1RM] bench and leg press) were also assessed before and after the 5-day loading period. Results indicated that there were 3 levels of response to the 5-day supplementation: responders (R), quasi responders (QR), and nonresponders (NR) with mean changes in resting Cr + PCr of 29.5 mmol.kg(-1) dw (n = 3), 14.9 mmol.kg(-1) dw (n = 5), and 5.1 mmol.kg(-1) dw (n = 3), respectively. The results support a person-by-treatment interaction to acute Cr supplementation with R possessing a biological profile of lowest initial levels of Cr + PCr, greatest percentage of type II fibers, and greatest preload muscle fiber CSA and fat-free mass. Responders also showed improvement in 1RM leg press scores following the 5-day loading period. NR had higher preload levels of Cr + PCr, less type II muscle fibers, small preload muscle CSA, and lower fat-free mass and displayed no improvements in 1RM strength scores. The results suggest that to be considered a responder to acute oral supplementation, a favorable preexisting biological profile may determine the final extent to which an individual responds to supplementation. Physiologic profiles of nonresponders appear to be different and may limit their ability to uptake Cr. This may help partially explain the reported equivocal performance findings in the Cr supplementation literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15320650     DOI: 10.1519/12392.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  31 in total

1.  Periodized resistance training with and without supplementation improve body composition and performance in older men.

Authors:  Matthew G Villanueva; Jiaxiu He; E Todd Schroeder
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  To Supplement or Not.

Authors:  Margaret E Gibson; Jon Schultz; Drew Glover
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

3.  Effects of long-term creatine feeding and running on isometric functional measures and myosin heavy chain content of rat skeletal muscles.

Authors:  Maria Gallo; Tessa Gordon; Daniel Syrotuik; Yang Shu; Neil Tyreman; Ian MacLean; Zoltan Kenwell; Charles T Putman
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 3.657

4.  Effects of Coffee and Caffeine Anhydrous Intake During Creatine Loading.

Authors:  Eric T Trexler; Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Erica J Roelofs; Katie R Hirsch; Adam M Persky; Meredith G Mock
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Effect of Creatine Supplementation Dosing Strategies on Aging Muscle Performance.

Authors:  J Chami; D G Candow
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.075

6.  The effects of supplementation with creatine and protein on muscle strength following a traditional resistance training program in middle-aged and older men.

Authors:  M G Bemben; M S Witten; J M Carter; K A Eliot; A W Knehans; D A Bemben
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.075

7.  The effects of Creatine Long-Term Supplementation on Muscle Morphology and Swimming Performance in Rats.

Authors:  Ahmet Yildiz; Ercan Ozdemir; Sefa Gulturk; Sena Erdal
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 8.  Can the use of creatine supplementation attenuate muscle loss in cachexia and wasting?

Authors:  Giorgos K Sakkas; Morris Schambelan; Kathleen Mulligan
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.294

9.  The effects of age on skeletal muscle and the phosphocreatine energy system: can creatine supplementation help older adults.

Authors:  Vincent J Dalbo; Michael D Roberts; Chris M Lockwood; Patrick S Tucker; Richard B Kreider; Chad M Kerksick
Journal:  Dyn Med       Date:  2009-12-24

Review 10.  Peak week recommendations for bodybuilders: an evidence based approach.

Authors:  Guillermo Escalante; Scott W Stevenson; Christopher Barakat; Alan A Aragon; Brad J Schoenfeld
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-06-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.