Literature DB >> 15320644

An analysis of full range of motion vs. partial range of motion training in the development of strength in untrained men.

C Dwayne Massey1, John Vincent, Mark Maneval, Melissa Moore, J T Johnson.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to compare partial range of motion versus full range of motion training in the development of maximal strength. The bench press was used as the criterion measurement. The study was conducted over a 10-week period with training sessions occurring twice per week. Subjects were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 (N = 11) trained with 3 full range of motion sets on the bench press. Group 2 (N = 15) trained with 3 partial range of motion sets. A partial repetition was defined as one that is beyond the sticking point 2 to 5 inches from full extension of the elbows. Group 3 (N = 30) trained with a combination of partial and full range of motion sets. All subjects were pre- and posttested on the bench press through a full range of motion using a 1 repetition maximum. Each of the 3 groups demonstrated statistically significant increases in strength from pre- to posttest. No differences were found between groups. These findings appear to suggest that partial range of motion training can positively influence the development of maximal strength. Therefore, those involved in the strength and conditioning profession can confidently including this method as an adjunct to their normal training protocols when working with individuals similar to those found in this investigation. It is suggested that additional research be conducted to further establish the effectiveness of partial range of motion training in developing maximal strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15320644     DOI: 10.1519/13263.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  3 in total

1.  Influence of full range of motion vs. equalized partial range of motion training on muscle architecture and mechanical properties.

Authors:  Maria João Valamatos; Francisco Tavares; Rute M Santos; António P Veloso; Pedro Mil-Homens
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-07-07       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Range of Motion and Sticking Region Effects on the Bench Press Load-Velocity Relationship.

Authors:  Alejandro Martínez-Cava; Ricardo Morán-Navarro; Alejandro Hernández-Belmonte; Javier Courel-Ibáñez; Elena Conesa-Ros; Juan José González-Badillo; Jesús G Pallarés
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 3.  Understanding and Overcoming the Sticking Point in Resistance Exercise.

Authors:  Justin Kompf; Ognjen Arandjelović
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 11.136

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.