Literature DB >> 15320467

Influence of electrode impedance on threshold voltage for transcranial electrical stimulation in motor evoked potential monitoring.

H L Journée1, H E Polak, M de Kleuver.   

Abstract

Motor potentials evoked by transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) are used for monitoring the motor pathways, with emphasis on the spinal cord and brainstem. The stimulus voltage threshold is the voltage below which no motor response can be elicited. It has frequently been used as a monitoring parameter. However, its value can be limited, because it is affected by the impedance of the stimulus electrode. For example, the voltage threshold can change owing to formation of oedema of the scalp. The relationship between the TES voltage threshold and the electrode impedance of different electrode types was studied and discussed in the context of neuromonitoring: 323 impedance and voltage threshold pairs were studied, and TES was performed with disc cup EEG electrodes (six), corkscrew electrodes (type I: seven, type II: eight), multiple EEG needle electrodes (16) and a large needle electrode Cz' (anode) together with a ground strip over the forehead (cathode) (286). The study found the voltage threshold to be strongly dependent on electrode impedance when the impedance was higher than 460 omega (correlation: R2=0.87; p < 0.001). Below 460 omega, which included 91% of the category with the largest electrode surfaces, 25% of the multiple EEG electrodes and 75% of type II corkscrew electrodes, no significant correlation (R2=0.0064; p=0.15) was found. It was concluded that the correlation between the TES voltage threshold and electrode impedance can be markedly reduced by using TES electrodes with large contact surfaces, resulting in limit values for these parameters. This also may improve the reliability of TES motor evoked potential monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15320467     DOI: 10.1007/bf02350999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  22 in total

1.  Transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring for brain tumor resection.

Authors:  V Deletis; A B Camargo
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Differential effects of nitrous oxide and propofol on myogenic transcranial motor evoked responses during sufentanil anaesthesia.

Authors:  L H Ubags; C J Kalkman; H D Been; J C Drummond
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  "Threshold-level" multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation of motor cortex for intraoperative monitoring of spinal motor tracts: description of method and comparison to somatosensory evoked potential monitoring.

Authors:  B Calancie; W Harris; J G Broton; N Alexeeva; B A Green
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Scope of a technique for electrical stimulation of human brain, spinal cord, and muscle.

Authors:  P A Merton; D K Hill; H B Morton; C D Marsden
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-09-11       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Dielectric properties of brain tissue between 0.01 and 10 GHz.

Authors:  K R Foster; J L Schepps; R D Stoy; H P Schwan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  The use of a circumferential cathode improves amplitude of intraoperative electrical transcranial myogenic motor evoked responses.

Authors:  L H Ubags; C J Kalkman; H D Been; J C Drummond
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Physical interpretation of Schwan's limit voltage of linearity.

Authors:  E T McAdams; J Jossinet
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Dielectric properties of mammalian tissues from 0.1 to 100 MHz: a summary of recent data.

Authors:  R D Stoy; K R Foster; H P Schwan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Some effects of isoflurane on I waves of the motor evoked potential.

Authors:  R G Hicks; I J Woodforth; M R Crawford; J P Stephen; D J Burke
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Transcranial high-frequency repetitive electrical stimulation for recording myogenic motor evoked potentials with the patient under general anesthesia.

Authors:  U Pechstein; C Cedzich; J Nadstawek; J Schramm
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  6 in total

1.  Multimodality intraoperative neuromonitoring in extreme lateral interbody fusion. Transcranial electrical stimulation as indispensable rearview.

Authors:  Hanneke I Berends; Henricus L Journée; Ilona Rácz; Jan van Loon; Roger Härtl; Maarten Spruit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: overview and update.

Authors:  David B Macdonald
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  Intraoperative neurophysiology of the motor system in children: a tailored approach.

Authors:  Francesco Sala; Paolo Manganotti; Stefan Grossauer; Vincenzo Tramontanto; Carlo Mazza; Massimo Gerosa
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Extramuscular Recording of Spontaneous EMG Activity and Transcranial Electrical Elicited Motor Potentials in Horses: Characteristics of Different Subcutaneous and Surface Electrode Types and Practical Guidelines.

Authors:  Sanne Lotte Journée; Henricus Louis Journée; Stephen Michael Reed; Hanneke Irene Berends; Cornelis Marinus de Bruijn; Cathérine John Ghislaine Delesalle
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 5.  Intra-operative neurophysiological mapping and monitoring during brain tumour surgery in children: an update.

Authors:  Angela Coppola; Vincenzo Tramontano; Federica Basaldella; Chiara Arcaro; Giovanna Squintani; Francesco Sala
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Intraoperative Neurophysiology Monitoring for Spinal Dysraphism.

Authors:  Keewon Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2020-09-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.