Literature DB >> 15319519

Spatio-temporal autoregressive models defined over brain manifolds.

Pedro A Valdes-Sosa1.   

Abstract

Multivariate Autoregressive time series models (MAR) are an increasingly used tool for exploring functional connectivity in Neuroimaging. They provide the framework for analyzing the Granger Causality of a given brain region on others. In this article, we shall limit our attention to linear MAR models, in which a set of matrices of autoregressive coefficients Ak (k = 1,...,p) describe the dependence of present values of the image on lagged values of its past. Methods for estimating the Ak and determining which elements that are zero are well-known and are the basis for directed measures of influence. However, to date, MAR models are limited in the number of time series they can handle, forcing the a priori selection of a (small) number of voxels or regions of interest for analysis. This ignores the full spatio-temporal nature of functional brain data which are, in fact, collections of time series sampled over an underlying continuous spatial manifold the brain. A fully spatio-temporal MAR model (ST-MAR) is developed within the framework of functional data analysis. For spatial data, each row of a matrix Ak is the influence field of a given voxel. A Bayesian ST-MAR model is specified in which the influence fields for all voxels are required to vary smoothly over space. This requirement is enforced by penalizing the spatial roughness of the influence fields. This roughness is calculated with a discrete version of the spatial Laplacian operator. A massive reduction in dimensionality of computations is achieved via the singular value decomposition, making an interactive exploration of the model feasible. Use of the model is illustrated with an fMRI time series that was gathered concurrently with EEG in order to analyze the origin of resting brain rhythms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15319519     DOI: 10.1385/NI:2:2:239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroinformatics        ISSN: 1539-2791


  20 in total

Review 1.  Revealing interactions among brain systems with nonlinear PCA.

Authors:  K Friston; J Phillips; D Chawla; C Büchel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Assessing interactions among neuronal systems using functional neuroimaging.

Authors:  C Büchel; K Friston
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2000 Oct-Nov

3.  Testing non-linearity and directedness of interactions between neural groups in the macaque inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  W A Freiwald; P Valdes; J Bosch; R Biscay; J C Jimenez; L M Rodriguez; V Rodriguez; A K Kreiter; W Singer
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance.

Authors:  M Kamiński; M Ding; W A Truccolo; S L Bressler
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Locally regularized spatiotemporal modeling and model comparison for functional MRI.

Authors:  P L Purdon; V Solo; R M Weisskoff; E N Brown
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination.

Authors:  L A Baccalá; K Sameshima
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  AN ANALYSIS OF AVERAGE EVOKED POTENTIALS MAKING USE OF LEAST MEAN SQUARE TECHNIQUES.

Authors:  D S RUCHKIN; J VILLEGAS; E R JOHN
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1964-07-31       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Simultaneous EEG and fMRI of the alpha rhythm.

Authors:  Robin I Goldman; John M Stern; Jerome Engel; Mark S Cohen
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation.

Authors:  K J Worsley; S Marrett; P Neelin; A C Vandal; K J Friston; A C Evans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components.

Authors:  M J McKeown; S Makeig; G G Brown; T P Jung; S S Kindermann; A J Bell; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.038

View more
  23 in total

1.  Assessing the spatiotemporal evolution of neuronal activation with single-trial event-related potentials and functional MRI.

Authors:  Tom Eichele; Karsten Specht; Matthias Moosmann; Marijtje L A Jongsma; Rodrigo Quian Quiroga; Helge Nordby; Kenneth Hugdahl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Estimating brain functional connectivity with sparse multivariate autoregression.

Authors:  Pedro A Valdés-Sosa; Jose M Sánchez-Bornot; Agustín Lage-Castellanos; Mayrim Vega-Hernández; Jorge Bosch-Bayard; Lester Melie-García; Erick Canales-Rodríguez
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Assessing functional connectivity in the human brain by fMRI.

Authors:  Baxter P Rogers; Victoria L Morgan; Allen T Newton; John C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  The equivalence of linear Gaussian connectivity techniques.

Authors:  Catherine E Davey; David B Grayden; Maria Gavrilescu; Gary F Egan; Leigh A Johnston
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Network diffusion accurately models the relationship between structural and functional brain connectivity networks.

Authors:  Farras Abdelnour; Henning U Voss; Ashish Raj
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Functional Parallel Factor Analysis for Functions of One- and Two-dimensional Arguments.

Authors:  Ji Yeh Choi; Heungsun Hwang; Marieke E Timmerman
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  Identification and validation of effective connectivity networks in functional magnetic resonance imaging using switching linear dynamic systems.

Authors:  Jason F Smith; Ajay Pillai; Kewei Chen; Barry Horwitz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Dynamic Granger-Geweke causality modeling with application to interictal spike propagation.

Authors:  Fa-Hsuan Lin; Keiko Hara; Victor Solo; Mark Vangel; John W Belliveau; Steven M Stufflebeam; Matti S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  State-Space Analysis of Granger-Geweke Causality Measures with Application to fMRI.

Authors:  Victor Solo
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 2.026

10.  A novel extended Granger Causal Model approach demonstrates brain hemispheric differences during face recognition learning.

Authors:  Tian Ge; Keith M Kendrick; Jianfeng Feng
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.