Literature DB >> 15318875

What's special about personally familiar faces? A multimodal approach.

Grit Herzmann1, Stefan R Schweinberger, Werner Sommer, Ines Jentzsch.   

Abstract

Dual-route models of face recognition suggest separate cognitive and affective routes. The predictions of these models were assessed in recognition tasks with unfamiliar, famous, and personally familiar faces. Whereas larger autonomic responses were only triggered for personally familiar faces, priming effects in reaction times to these faces, presumably reflecting cognitive recognition processes, were equal to those of famous faces. Activation of stored structural representations of familiar faces (face recognition units) was assessed by recording the N250r component in event-related brain potentials. Face recognition unit activation increased from unfamiliar over famous to personally familiar faces, suggesting that there are stronger representations for personally familiar than for famous faces. Because the topographies of the N250r for personally and famous faces were indistinguishable, a similar network of face recognition units can be assumed for both types of faces.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15318875     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00196.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  36 in total

1.  Response to familiar faces, newly familiar faces, and novel faces as assessed by ERPs is intact in adults with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Sara J Webb; Emily J H Jones; Kristen Merkle; Michael Murias; Jessica Greenson; Todd Richards; Elizabeth Aylward; Geraldine Dawson
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  Knowledge scale effects in face recognition: an electrophysiological investigation.

Authors:  Rasha Abdel Rahman; Werner Sommer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  Knowledge is power: how conceptual knowledge transforms visual cognition.

Authors:  Jessica A Collins; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-08

4.  Caricature generalization benefits for faces learned with enhanced idiosyncratic shape or texture.

Authors:  Marlena L Itz; Stefan R Schweinberger; Jürgen M Kaufmann
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Influence of lag length on repetition priming in emotional stimuli: ERP evidence.

Authors:  Delin Zhang; Aiqing Nie; Zhixuan Wang; Mengsi Li
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 2.352

6.  Face processing in children with autism spectrum disorder: independent or interactive processing of facial identity and facial expression?

Authors:  Julia F Krebs; Ajanta Biswas; Olivier Pascalis; Inge Kamp-Becker; Helmuth Remschmidt; Gudrun Schwarzer
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2011-06

7.  Emotional content modulates response inhibition and perceptual processing.

Authors:  Suyong Yang; Wenbo Luo; Xiangru Zhu; Lucas S Broster; Taolin Chen; Jinzhen Li; Yuejia Luo
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  The neural plasticity of other-race face recognition.

Authors:  James W Tanaka; Lara J Pierce
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Early identity recognition of familiar faces is not dependent on holistic processing.

Authors:  Sarah Mohr; Anxu Wang; Andrew D Engell
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Viewing loved faces inhibits defense reactions: a health-promotion mechanism?

Authors:  Pedro Guerra; Alicia Sánchez-Adam; Lourdes Anllo-Vento; Isabel Ramírez; Jaime Vila
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.