Literature DB >> 15318565

Improving the medical malpractice litigation process.

Catherine T Struve1.   

Abstract

Critics charge that judges and juries are incompetent to address medical liability issues. Some advocate shifting authority away from ordinary judges and juries, either by appointing "expert" decisionmakers, such as "medical screening panels" or specialized "medical courts," or by instituting caps on damages. Problems with the tort liability system may weigh in favor of a shift to a no-fault administrative compensation system. If the current fault-based system is retained, however, policymakers should not adopt half-measures by creating "expert" panels or "expert" courts. Rather, they should better equip the existing decisionmakers to deal with liability and damages questions.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15318565     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.4.33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  2 in total

1.  A medico-legal review of cases involving quadriplegia following cervical spine surgery: Is there an argument for a no-fault compensation system?

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2010-04-07

2.  Correlation Between Malpractice Litigation and Legislation Reform in Taiwan Over a 30-Year Period.

Authors:  Ming-Ta Hsieh; Li-Hui Lu; Chi-Wei Lin; Yun-Wen Chen
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-05-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.