Literature DB >> 15318256

Resistance of bonded composite restorations to fracture of endodontically treated teeth.

A R Daneshkazemi1.   

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro study was performed to evaluate the effect of dentin bonding agents and glass ionomer cement beneath composite restorations and its resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth. Fifty sound extracted maxillary teeth were selected; ten of them for controls and the remainder were modified with root canal treatment and a mesial occlusal distal (MOD) cavity preparation. The modified teeth were then divided into five groups: 1. Sound teeth 2. Prepared without restorations for control 3. Prepared and restored with Vitrebond (3M, USA), Singlebond (3M, USA), and Z100 (3M, USA) resin composite 4. Prepared and restored with Concise enamel bonding agent (3M, USA) and Z100 resin composite 5. Prepared and restored using Singlebond and Z100 composite resin The modified specimens were subjected to compressive load by an Instron machine until fracture occurred. Group 1 showed the highest resistance to compressive force followed by Groups 5, 3, 4, and 2, respectively. Statistical analysis using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a t-test indicated significant difference between all groups. Use of a dentin bonding agent and composite resin increased the resistance of endodontically treated teeth to fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15318256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contemp Dent Pract        ISSN: 1526-3711


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth using different coronal restorative materials: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Prashant Monga; Vivek Sharma; Sukesh Kumar
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2009-10

2.  A temporary filling material during endodontic treatment may cause tooth fractures in two-surface class II cavities in vitro.

Authors:  Christian Tennert; Gesine Friederike Fischer; Kirstin Vach; Johan Peter Woelber; Elmar Hellwig; Olga Polydorou
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Effect of composite/amalgam thickness on fracture resistance of maxillary premolar teeth, restored with combined amalgam-composite restorations.

Authors:  Maryam Firouzmandi; Maryam Doozandeh; Zahra Jowkar; Sanaz Abbasi
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2016-07-01

4.  Indexing of Iranian Publications in Well-known Endodontic Textbooks: A Scientometric Analysis.

Authors:  Sina Kakooei; Mahshid Mostafavi; Masoud Parirokh; Saeed Asgary
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2016-05-01

5.  Influence of Different Post Luting Cements on the Fracture Strength of Endodontically Treated Teeth: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Samran; Mohammed O Najjar; Ahlam Samran; Majed Al-Akhali; Sadeq A Al-Maweri; Mutlu Özcan
Journal:  Eur Endod J       Date:  2018-07-19

6.  Effect of Smart Dentin Replacement, Biodentine, and Its Combination for Dentin Replacement as Alternatives to Full-crown Coverage for Endodontically Treated Molars: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Samrat R Magaravalli; Shamshuddin Jr Patel; Purushothama Rangaswamy; Sujith Ramachandra; Kavitha Govindappa; Vidhya Hiremath
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2019-11-12

7.  Influence of Access Cavity Design on the Fracture Strength of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored Using Short Fiber-Reinforced Composite and High Strength Posterior Glass Ionomer Cement.

Authors:  Vaddempudi Divyasree; Jmv Raghavendra Reddy; Veeramachaneni Chandrasekhar; Swetha Kasam; Nimeshika Ramachandruni; Sivaram Penigalapati; Swathi Aravelli; Sindhura Alam
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-18

8.  Effect of different luting cements on fracture resistance in endodontically treated teeth.

Authors:  Narmin Mohammadi; Amir Ahmad Ajami; Soodabeh Kimyai; Mojdeh Rezaei Aval
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2008-10-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.