Literature DB >> 15318051

Applications of a mouse model of calvarial healing: differences in regenerative abilities of juveniles and adults.

Oliver O Aalami1, Randall P Nacamuli, Kelly A Lenton, Catherine M Cowan, Tony D Fang, Kenton D Fong, Yun-Ying Shi, HanJoon M Song, David E Sahar, Michael T Longaker.   

Abstract

Young children are capable of healing large calvarial defects, whereas adults lack this endogenous osseous tissue-engineering capacity. Despite the important clinical implications, little is known about the molecular and cell biology underlying this differential ability. Traditionally, guinea pig, rabbit, and rat models have been used to study the orchestration of calvarial healing. To harness the research potential of knockout and transgenic mice, the authors developed a mouse model for calvarial healing. Nonsuture-associated parietal defects 3, 4, and 5 mm in diameter were made in both juvenile (6-day-old, n = 15) and adult (60-day-old, n = 15) mice. Calvariae were harvested after 8 weeks and analyzed radiographically and histologically. Percentage of healing was quantified using Scion Image software analysis of calvarial radiographs. A significant difference in the ability to heal calvarial defects was seen between 6-day-old and 60-day-old mice when 3-, 4-, or 5-mm defects were created. The authors' analysis revealed that juvenile mice healed a significantly greater percentage of their calvarial defects than adult mice (juvenile mean percentage of healing: 3-mm defects, 59 percent; 4-mm defects, 65 percent; 5-mm defects, 44 percent; adult mean percentage of healing: <5 percent in all groups; p < 0.05). All three defect sizes were found to be critical in the adult, whereas significant healing was seen regardless of the size of the defect in juvenile mice. The establishment of this model will facilitate further, detailed evaluation of the molecular biology underlying the different regenerative abilities of juvenile versus adult mice and enhance research into membranous bone induction by making available powerful tools such as knockout and transgenic animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15318051     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000131016.12754.30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  35 in total

1.  Uncultured marrow mononuclear cells delivered within fibrin glue hydrogels to porous scaffolds enhance bone regeneration within critical-sized rat cranial defects.

Authors:  James D Kretlow; Patrick P Spicer; John A Jansen; Charles A Vacanti; F Kurtis Kasper; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 2.  The role of NELL-1, a growth factor associated with craniosynostosis, in promoting bone regeneration.

Authors:  X Zhang; J Zara; R K Siu; K Ting; C Soo
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Notch signaling components are upregulated during both endochondral and intramembranous bone regeneration.

Authors:  Michael I Dishowitz; Shawn P Terkhorn; Sandra A Bostic; Kurt D Hankenson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Cell line IDG-SW3 replicates osteoblast-to-late-osteocyte differentiation in vitro and accelerates bone formation in vivo.

Authors:  Stacey M Woo; Jennifer Rosser; Vladimir Dusevich; Ivo Kalajzic; Lynda F Bonewald
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Effects of low dose FGF-2 and BMP-2 on healing of calvarial defects in old mice.

Authors:  Lyndon F Charles; Jessica L Woodman; Daisuke Ueno; Gloria Gronowicz; Marja M Hurley; Liisa T Kuhn
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 4.032

6.  Nano-Structured Gelatin/Bioactive Glass Hybrid Scaffolds for the Enhancement of Odontogenic Differentiation of Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells.

Authors:  Tiejun Qu; Xiaohua Liu
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 6.331

7.  Collagen-hydroxyapatite composite enhances regeneration of calvaria bone defects in young rats but postpones the regeneration of calvaria bone in aged rats.

Authors:  Ion Tcacencu; Mikael Wendel
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Human adipose derived stromal cells heal critical size mouse calvarial defects.

Authors:  Benjamin Levi; Aaron W James; Emily R Nelson; Dean Vistnes; Benjamin Wu; Min Lee; Ankur Gupta; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Bone regeneration mediated by BMP4-expressing muscle-derived stem cells is affected by delivery system.

Authors:  Arvydas Usas; Andrew M Ho; Gregory M Cooper; Anne Olshanski; Hairong Peng; Johnny Huard
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Fibrocartilage Stem Cells Engraft and Self-Organize into Vascularized Bone.

Authors:  J Nathan; A Ruscitto; S Pylawka; A Sohraby; C J Shawber; M C Embree
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 6.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.