Literature DB >> 15318037

Reconstruction using a three-dimensional orbitozygomatic skeletal model of titanium mesh plate and soft-tissue free flap transfer following total maxillectomy.

Bin Nakayama1, Yasuhisa Hasegawa, Ikuo Hyodo, Tetsuya Ogawa, Yasushi Fujimoto, Hiroya Kitano, Shuhei Torii.   

Abstract

The surgical strategy for maxillary reconstruction after maxillectomy has yet to be standardized. The authors developed a technique using a three-dimensional orbitozygomatic skeletal model of a titanium mesh for skeletal reconstruction after maxillectomy. From May of 1996 to September of 2000, 18 patients underwent reconstruction using the titanium mesh model in conjunction with a soft-tissue free flap following total maxillectomy for a maxillary malignancy. The soft-tissue free flap was conventional and consisted of two skin paddles to the maxillary defect. One skin paddle became the lateral nasal wall and the other was used to close the palatal defect. After modeling, the titanium mesh plate was implanted between the orbital contents and the upper edge of the free flap to lie over the front of the flap. The model was fixed to the residual zygoma laterally and to the nasal or frontal bone medially. The palatal skin paddle was anchored by three or four dermal stitches to the bottom edge of the titanium mesh to create a concave neopalate that allowed the patient to wear a denture. Thirteen of 18 patients who underwent implantation had good facial appearance and oral function. This procedure prevented lagophthalmos, facial deformity, and sagging of the palatal skin paddle caused by gravitational force. Five patients (27.8 percent) developed exposure or infection of the implant and lost the benefit of having the prosthesis. However, treatment did not require total removal of the implant. Maintaining adequate tissue volume during soft-tissue transfer on either side of the mesh plate may minimize the complication rate. Titanium mesh implantation for skeletal reconstruction after maxillectomy avoids the need for bone grafting and may be especially beneficial in fragile or aged patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15318037     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000130940.46400.7f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  6 in total

1.  Reconstruction of the maxilla with loss of the orbital floor and orbital preservation: a case for the iliac crest with internal oblique.

Authors:  James S Brown
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 2.  Mid-facial reconstruction after maxillectomy.

Authors:  Yuhei Yamamoto
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  [Skull base chondrosarcoma. An interdisciplinary challenge].

Authors:  P U Lohnstein; J Schipper; M Tatagiba; N-C Gellrich; A Berlis; W Maier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [Reconstruction of complex midfacial defects with individualized titanium implants].

Authors:  H Kokemüller; C von See; H Essig; F Tavassol; M Rücker; A Schramm; O Majdani; N-C Gellrich
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Maxillary reconstruction: Current concepts and controversies.

Authors:  Subramania Iyer; Krishnakumar Thankappan
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2014-01

6.  Platelet-Rich Plasma in Reconstruction of Posterior Meatal Wall after Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy.

Authors:  Mohammad El-Sayed Abd Elbary; Wail Fayez Nasr; Samir Sorour Sorour
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-05-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.