Literature DB >> 15317833

Simvastatin does not have a clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction with fenofibrate in humans.

Arthur J Bergman1, Gail Murphy, Joanne Burke, Jamie J Zhao, Robert Valesky, Lida Liu, Kenneth C Lasseter, Weili He, Thomayant Prueksaritanont, Yue Qiu, Alan Hartford, Jose M Vega, John F Paolini.   

Abstract

Simvastatin and fenofibrate are both commonly used lipid-regulating agents with distinct mechanisms of action, and their coadministration may be an attractive treatment for some patients with dyslipidemia. A 2-period, randomized, open-label, crossover study was conducted in 12 subjects to determine if fenofibrate and simvastatin are subject to a clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interaction at steady state. In treatment A, subjects received an 80-mg simvastatin tablet in the morning for 7 days. In treatment B, subjects received a 160-mg micronized fenofibrate capsule in the morning for 7 days, followed by a 160-mg micronized fenofibrate capsule dosed together with an 80-mg simvastatin tablet on days 8 to 14. Because food increases the bioavailability of fenofibrate, each dose was administered with food to maximize the exposure of fenofibric acid. The steady-state pharmacokinetics (AUC(0-24h), C(max), and t(max)) of active and total HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, simvastatin acid, and simvastatin were determined following simvastatin administration with and without fenofibrate. Also, fenofibric acid steady-state pharmacokinetics were evaluated with and without simvastatin. The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) for AUC(0-24h) (80 mg simvastatin [SV] + 160 mg fenofibrate)/(80 mg simvastatin alone) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were 0.88 (0.80, 0.95) and 0.92 (0.82, 1.03) for active and total HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. The GMRs and 90% CIs for fenofibric acid (80 mg SV + 160 mg fenofibrate/160 mg fenofibrate alone) AUC(0-24h) and C(max) were 0.95 (0.88, 1.04) and 0.89 (0.77, 1.02), respectively. Because both the active inhibitor and fenofibric acid AUC GMR 90% confidence intervals fell within the prespecified bounds of (0.70, 1.43), no clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interaction between fenofibrate and simvastatin was concluded in humans. The coadministration of simvastatin and fenofibrate in this study was well tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15317833     DOI: 10.1177/0091270004268044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  25 in total

Review 1.  Fenofibrate: a review of its use in primary dyslipidaemia, the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating; Katherine F Croom
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Fenofibrate: a review of its use in dyslipidaemia.

Authors:  Kate McKeage; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Comparative effects of fibrates on drug metabolizing enzymes in human hepatocytes.

Authors:  Thomayant Prueksaritanont; Karen M Richards; Yue Qiu; Kristine Strong-Basalyga; Alisha Miller; Chunze Li; Roy Eisenhandler; Edward J Carlini
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  An Endocrine Perspective of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD).

Authors:  Romina Lomonaco; Janet Chen; Kenneth Cusi
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.565

Review 5.  HDL and cognition in neurodegenerative disorders.

Authors:  David A Hottman; Dustin Chernick; Shaowu Cheng; Zhe Wang; Ling Li
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.996

6.  Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction of mipomersen sodium (ISIS 301012), a 2'-O-methoxyethyl modified antisense oligonucleotide targeting apolipoprotein B-100 messenger RNA, with simvastatin and ezetimibe.

Authors:  Rosie Z Yu; Richard S Geary; Joann D Flaim; Gina C Riley; Diane L Tribble; André A vanVliet; Mark K Wedel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetic comparison of the potential over-the-counter statins simvastatin, lovastatin, fluvastatin and pravastatin.

Authors:  Pertti J Neuvonen; Janne T Backman; Mikko Niemi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Dyslipidemia and cardiovascular risk: the importance of early prevention.

Authors:  M Miller
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2009-06-04

9.  Simvastatin inhibits protein isoprenylation in the brain.

Authors:  Stephen M Ostrowski; Kachael Johnson; Matthew Siefert; Sam Shank; Luigi Sironi; Benjamin Wolozin; Gary E Landreth; Assem G Ziady
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 10.  Thinking beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: strategies to further reduce cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Rakesh K Sharma; Vibhuti N Singh; Hanumanth K Reddy
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.