Literature DB >> 15317566

Effectiveness of electrochemically activated water as an irrigant in an infected tooth model.

K Gulabivala1, C J R Stock, J D Lewsey, S Ghori, Y-L Ng, D A Spratt.   

Abstract

AIM: To test the effectiveness of electrochemically activated aqueous solutions in the debridement of Enterococcus faecalis biofilms in root canals of extracted teeth.
METHODOLOGY: Extracted, human, single-rooted teeth (198) assembled into 11 sets (n = 18) with matching anatomical characteristics were randomly assigned to eight experimental groups. After decoronation, the root canals were prepared to a standard size. Enterococcus faecalis biofilms were grown in the root canals of autoclaved, individually mounted teeth over 48 h. Electrolysed saline collected as anolyte at the anode and catholyte at the cathode were the test agents. The four ultrasonication and four without ultrasonication irrigant groups included: neutral anolyte (NA) (pH 6.5), acidic anolyte (AA) (pH 3.0), catholyte (C) (pH 11.5) and C alternated with neutral anolyte (C/NA). Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with and without ultrasonication formed negative and NaOCl (3%) positive control groups. After irrigation, root canal samples were serially diluted, cultured and enumerated. The data were analysed as ratios of residual colony-forming units (CFUs) in PBS versus the test irrigants and using multivariate regression.
RESULTS: The NA and NA (ultrasonicated, U), C/NA and AA (U) groups had significantly (alpha = 0.05) less and C (U) and C/NA (U) significantly (alpha = 0.05) more bacteria (CFUs mL(-1)) compared with their respective PBS controls. Ultrasonicated C/NA had significantly (alpha = 0.05) higher CFU counts than the nonultrasonicated solution. Other comparisons between ultrasonic and nonultrasonic groups were not significant. Of the nonultrasonicated groups, C/NA and NA were most effective, whilst of the ultrasonicated groups, AA and NA were most effective. None of these was as effective as 3% NaOCl.
CONCLUSIONS: All but two groups (AA and C) were significantly different from their PBS controls. There was a significant difference between the C/NA groups with and without ultrasonication but not between other combinations. NA (U) and AA (U) were the most effective test solutions but NaOCl (3%) gave by far the highest bacterial kills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15317566     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00867.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Endod J        ISSN: 0143-2885            Impact factor:   5.264


  5 in total

Review 1.  Electrochemically activated solutions: evidence for antimicrobial efficacy and applications in healthcare environments.

Authors:  R M S Thorn; S W H Lee; G M Robinson; J Greenman; D M Reynolds
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Antimicrobial irrigants in the endodontic therapy.

Authors:  Azhar Iqbal
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2012-06

3.  Anti bacterial Effectiveness of Electro- Chemically Activated (ECA) Water as a Root Canal Irrigant- An In-vitro Comparative Study.

Authors:  S Lata; Soumya Kanta Mohanty; Prasanti Kumari Pradhan; Gaurav Patri; Sachidananda Prasad Sinha; Pratik Agrawal
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-10-01

Review 4.  Effectiveness of ultrasonically activated irrigation on root canal disinfection: a systematic review of in vitro studies.

Authors:  Venkateshbabu Nagendrababu; Jayakumar Jayaraman; Anand Suresh; Senthilnayagam Kalyanasundaram; Prasanna Neelakantan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  Antibacterial efficacy of intracanal medicaments on bacterial biofilm: a critical review.

Authors:  Carlos Estrela; Gilson Blitzkow Sydney; José Antonio Poli Figueiredo; Cyntia Rodrigues de Araújo Estrela
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.