Literature DB >> 15316978

Inheritance of most X-linked traits is not dominant or recessive, just X-linked.

William B Dobyns1, Allison Filauro, Brett N Tomson, April S Chan, Allen W Ho, Nicholas T Ting, Jan C Oosterwijk, Carole Ober.   

Abstract

The existence of X-linked disorders in humans has been recognized for many centuries, based on lessons in religious texts and observations of specific human families (e.g., color blindness or Daltonism). Our modern concepts of Mendelian (including X-linked) inheritance originated just after the turn of the last century. Early concepts of dominance and recessiveness were first used in conjunction with autosomal traits, and then applied to "sex"-linked traits to distinguish X-linked recessive and X-linked dominant inheritance. The former was defined as vertical transmission in which carrier women pass the disorder to affected sons, while the latter was defined as vertical transmission in which daughters of affected males are always affected, transmitting the disorder to offspring of both sexes. However, many X-linked disorders such as adrenoleukodystrophy, fragile X syndrome, and ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency do not fit these rules. We reviewed the literature on 32 X-linked disorders and recorded information on penetrance and expressivity in both sexes. As expected, penetrance and an index of severity of the phenotype (defined in our Methods) were both high in males, while the severity index was low in females. Contrary to standard presentations of X-linked inheritance, penetrance was highly variable in females. Our analysis classified penetrance as high in 28% of the disorders studied, intermediate in 31%, and low in 40%. The high proportion of X-linked disorders with intermediate penetrance is difficult to reconcile with standard definitions of X-linked recessive and dominant inheritance. They do not capture the extraordinarily variable expressivity of X-linked disorders or take into account the multiple mechanisms that can result in disease expression in females, which include cell autonomous expression, skewed X-inactivation, clonal expansion, and somatic mosaicism. We recommend that use of the terms X-linked recessive and dominant be discontinued, and that all such disorders be simply described as following "X-linked" inheritance. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15316978     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  42 in total

1.  Natural history of Fabry disease in females in the Fabry Outcome Survey.

Authors:  P B Deegan; A F Baehner; M-A Barba Romero; D A Hughes; C Kampmann; M Beck
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 2.  X chromosome inactivation in clinical practice.

Authors:  Karen Helene Orstavik
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Somatic mosaicism for a PDHA1 mutation in a female with pyruvate dehydrogenase deficiency.

Authors:  Cheryl K Ridout; Ruth M Brown; John H Walter; Garry K Brown
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2008-08-17       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Cellular resolution maps of X chromosome inactivation: implications for neural development, function, and disease.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Junjie Luo; Huimin Yu; Amir Rattner; Alisa Mo; Yanshu Wang; Philip M Smallwood; Bracha Erlanger; Sarah J Wheelan; Jeremy Nathans
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Asymptomatic adrenoleukodystrophy in elderly males.

Authors:  Chiara Benzoni; Silvia Fenu; Viviana Pensato; Elena Mauro; Cinzia Gellera; Davide Pareyson; Ettore Salsano
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Probability Distributome: A Web Computational Infrastructure for Exploring the Properties, Interrelations, and Applications of Probability Distributions.

Authors:  Ivo D Dinov; Kyle Siegrist; Dennis K Pearl; Alexandr Kalinin; Nicolas Christou
Journal:  Comput Stat       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 7.  Where genotype is not predictive of phenotype: towards an understanding of the molecular basis of reduced penetrance in human inherited disease.

Authors:  David N Cooper; Michael Krawczak; Constantin Polychronakos; Chris Tyler-Smith; Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 8.  Expression of the disease on female carriers of X-linked lysosomal disorders: a brief review.

Authors:  Louise L C Pinto; Taiane A Vieira; Roberto Giugliani; Ida V D Schwartz
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 4.123

9.  Long-term follow-up of a family with dominant X-linked retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  D M Wu; H Khanna; P Atmaca-Sonmez; P A Sieving; K Branham; M Othman; A Swaroop; S P Daiger; J R Heckenlively
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Clinical and biochemical studies in mucopolysaccharidosis type II carriers.

Authors:  I V D Schwartz; L L C Pinto; G Breda; L Lima; M G Ribeiro; J G Mota; A X Acosta; P Correia; D D G Horovitz; C G G Porciuncula; E Lipinski-Figueiredo; A C Fett-Conte; R P Oliveira Sobrinho; D Y J Norato; A C Paula; C A Kim; A R Duarte; R Boy; S Leistner-Segal; M G Burin; R Giugliani
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2009-10-10       Impact factor: 4.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.