Literature DB >> 15316957

Worry about ovarian cancer risk and use of screening by high-risk women: how you recruit affects what you find.

M Robyn Andersen1, Judy Nelson, Sue Peacock, Antoinette Giedzinska, Charles Dresher, Deborah Bowen, Nicole Urban.   

Abstract

Several studies have described the characteristics of women at high-risk for ovarian cancer who are participating in registry studies and high-risk screening programs. These studies have found high-risk women to report high levels of perceived risk and worry about their risk for ovarian cancer. In contrast, population based studies have found that while high-risk women did report high levels of perceived risk, they did not report high levels of worry about their risk. In this study, we examine reports of perceived risk, worry about ovarian cancer, and use of screening by high-risk women recruited to participate in a survey from several recruitment sources. These sources include self-, physician-, and affected patient relative-referral, a fundraising mailer, and a mass mailing to a commercial mailing list. High-risk women recruited via mass mailing were less likely than those recruited via physicians or affected relatives to report either worry about their risk or use of ovarian cancer screening tests. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15316957     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  5 in total

1.  Cancer Risk Awareness and Concern among Women with a Family History of Breast or Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  M Robyn Andersen; Jason Thorpe; Diana S M Buist; J David Beatty; Kate Watabayashi; Nancy Hanson; Robert Resta; Jessica Chubak; Nicole Urban
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.104

2.  Awareness of ovarian cancer risk factors, beliefs and attitudes towards screening: baseline survey of 21,715 women participating in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening.

Authors:  L Fallowfield; A Fleissig; J Barrett; U Menon; I Jacobs; J Kilkerr; V Farewell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  False-positive screening events and worry influence decisions about surgery among high-risk women.

Authors:  M Robyn Andersen; Beth Y Karlan; Charles W Drescher; Pamela Paley; Sarah Hawley; Melanie Palomares; Mary B Daly; Nicole Urban
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 5.556

4.  Anxiety, locus of control and sociodemographic factors associated with adherence to an annual clinical skin monitoring: a cross-sectional survey among 1000 high-risk French patients involved in a pilot-targeted screening programme for melanoma.

Authors:  Cédric Rat; Sandrine Hild; Aurelie Gaultier; Amir Khammari; Angelique Bonnaud-Antignac; Gaelle Quereux; Brigitte Dreno; Jean Michel Nguyen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Engaging military couples in marital research: does requesting referrals from service members to recruit their spouses introduce sample bias?

Authors:  Hope Seib McMaster; Valerie A Stander; Christianna S Williams; Kelly A Woodall; Christopher A O'Malley; Lauren M Bauer; Evelyn P Davila
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.615

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.