Literature DB >> 15316901

Tissue microarray immunohistochemical expression of estrogen, progesterone, and androgen receptors in uterine leiomyomata and leiomyosarcoma.

Mario M Leitao1, Robert A Soslow, Daisuke Nonaka, Adam B Olshen, Carol Aghajanian, Paul Sabbatini, Jakob Dupont, Martee Hensley, Yukio Sonoda, Richard R Barakat, Sibyl Anderson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Benign uterine leiomyomata (LMA) are hormonally responsive neoplasms. To the authors' knowledge, little is known regarding the hormonal expression patterns of leiomyosarcomas (LMSs) of the uterus. The objective of the current study was to assess the immunohistochemical (IHC) patterns of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and androgen receptor (AR) expression in LMA and LMS of the uterus using a tissue microarray. The authors also sought to assess the prognostic value of ER, PR, and AR expression in LMS.
METHODS: Between January 1991 and March 2001, 25 patients were identified with primary uterine LMS for whom tissue was available. A tissue microarray was created with 3 representative cores from each of the LMS cases, as well as from 19 cases with benign uterine LMA. IHC staining was scored as follows: negative (0-1) and positive (2-3). Outcome analyses were performed for LMS only. First recurrence was determined from the time of the initial diagnosis. Survival was determined from the time of the initial diagnosis to last follow-up.
RESULTS: ER, PR, and AR positivity in LMA compared with LMS was as follows: ER, 78% versus 40% (P = 0.03); PR, 88% versus 38% (P = 0.001); and AR, 32% versus 40% (P = 0.75). There was no difference noted with regard to IHC expression based on stage of LMS. The median overall survival for patients with LMS was 23.5 months (95% confidence interval, 19.5, NR). When adjusted for stage, PR and AR were found to be predictive of a lower risk of recurrence (P = 0.01 and P = 0.035, respectively). ER, PR, and AR were not found to be associated with overall survival after adjustment for stage. Tumor stage was found to be associated with survival (P = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of ER and PR expression was found to be significantly less in uterine LMS compared with LMA. ER, PR, and AR expression was observed in approximately 30-40% of uterine LMS cases. In the current series, PR and AR expression appeared to be associated with disease-free survival but were not found to correlate with overall survival. Copyright 2004 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15316901     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  30 in total

1.  A nomogram to predict postresection 5-year overall survival for patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Oliver Zivanovic; Lindsay M Jacks; Alexia Iasonos; Mario M Leitao; Robert A Soslow; Emanuela Veras; Dennis S Chi; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Richard R Barakat; Murray F Brennan; Martee L Hensley
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Identification of key genes and pathways in uterine leiomyosarcoma through bioinformatics analysis.

Authors:  Yuqin Zang; Lina Gu; Yanfang Zhang; Yingmei Wang; Fengxia Xue
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  BCOR is a robust diagnostic immunohistochemical marker of genetically diverse high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, including tumors exhibiting variant morphology.

Authors:  Sarah Chiang; Cheng-Han Lee; Colin J R Stewart; Esther Oliva; Lien N Hoang; Rola H Ali; Martee L Hensley; Javier A Arias-Stella; Denise Frosina; Achim A Jungbluth; Ryma Benayed; Marc Ladanyi; Meera Hameed; Lu Wang; Yu-Chien Kao; Cristina R Antonescu; Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 4.  Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) consensus review: uterine and ovarian leiomyosarcomas.

Authors:  Martee L Hensley; Brigitte A Barrette; Klaus Baumann; David Gaffney; Anne L Hamilton; Jae-Weon Kim; Johanna U Maenpaa; Patricia Pautier; Nadeem Ahmad Siddiqui; Anneke M Westermann; Isabelle Ray-Coquard
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.437

5.  Additional value of 16α-[18F]fluoro-17β-oestradiol PET for differential diagnosis between uterine sarcoma and leiomyoma in patients with positive or equivocal findings on [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET.

Authors:  Yoshio Yoshida; Yasushi Kiyono; Tetsuya Tsujikawa; Tetsuji Kurokawa; Hidehiko Okazawa; Fumikazu Kotsuji
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Practical issues in uterine pathology from banal to bewildering: the remarkable spectrum of smooth muscle neoplasia.

Authors:  Esther Oliva
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  Treatment of advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma with aromatase inhibitors.

Authors:  Roisin O'Cearbhaill; Qin Zhou; Alexia Iasonos; Robert A Soslow; Mario M Leitao; Carol Aghajanian; Martee L Hensley
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  [Mesenchymal uterine tumors. Leiomyomas].

Authors:  S Lax
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.011

9.  Molecular mechanisms of uterine leiomyosarcomas: involvement of defect in LMP2 expression.

Authors:  Takuma Hayashi; Yuto Shimamura; Taro Saegusa; Akiko Horiuchi; Yukihiro Kobayashi; Nobuyoshi Hiraoka; Yae Kanai; Hiroyuki Aburatani; Kenji Sano; Ikuo Konishi
Journal:  Gene Regul Syst Bio       Date:  2008-07-22

Review 10.  Treatment of early uterine sarcomas: disentangling adjuvant modalities.

Authors:  Flora Zagouri; Athanasios-Meletios Dimopoulos; Stelios Fotiou; Vassilios Kouloulias; Christos A Papadimitriou
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.