Literature DB >> 15316865

Bone densitometry: which skeletal sites are best predicted by bone mass determinants?

Warren T K Lee1, Albert Y K Cheung, Joseph Lau, Simon K M Lee, Ling Qin, Jack C Y Cheng.   

Abstract

Evaluation of bone mineral content/bone mass density (BMC/BMD) is important to determine bone mass development among adolescents in health and disease. It is uncertain at which skeletal site BMC/BMD is best predicted by bone mass determinants. On the other hand, intrapersonal BMC/BMD data can be clustered into a composite index score to facilitate correlation and outcome prediction analysis. This study aimed to identify the skeletal site that was best predicted by bone mass determinants and to develop a composite index score based on multisite BMC/BMD values in healthy adolescent girls. Eleven BMD/BMC variables per subject were evaluated by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) in 236 healthy girls aged 12-15 years. Bone mass determinants, namely, weight, height, puberty, dietary calcium, physical activity, and bone turnover markers, were determined. Factor analysis was used to develop composite index scores that summarized characteristics of multisite BMC/BMD. Results showed that lumbar spinal BMD and BMC (by DXA) and tibial integral BMD (by pQCT) were the BMC/BMD sites better predicted by bone mass determinants (R2, 0.57-0.77) in multiple regression analysis. On the other hand, three composite index scores representing areal BMD, areal BMC, and vBMD were derived to summarize the original BMC/BMD values. The composite index scores had similar predicting power (R2, 0.419-0.749) compared to those of original BMC/BMD, indicating that the composite index scores were representative of the original variables. To conclude, lumbar spinal BMD and BMC and tibial integral BMD were the three BMC/BMD variables better predicted by bone mass determinants. This evaluation would help select appropriate skeletal sites as outcome measures for bone mass evaluation in future studies. Also, the development of composite index scores could help reduce the number of variables for correlation and outcome prediction analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15316865     DOI: 10.1007/s00774-004-0506-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab        ISSN: 0914-8779            Impact factor:   2.626


  5 in total

1.  Five-year follow-up study of a kidney-tonifying herbal Fufang for prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis and fragility fractures.

Authors:  Wei-Min Deng; Peng Zhang; Hai Huang; You-Gao Shen; Qin-Hua Yang; Wei-Li Cui; Yang-Shu He; Song Wei; Zhu Ye; Fang Liu; Ling Qin
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Generalized low bone mass of girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is related to inadequate calcium intake and weight bearing physical activity in peripubertal period.

Authors:  Warren T K Lee; Catherine S K Cheung; Yee Kit Tse; Xia Guo; Ling Qin; Suzanne C Ho; Joseph Lau; Jack C Y Cheng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  A comparison of principal component analysis and factor analysis strategies for uncovering pleiotropic factors.

Authors:  Xiaojing Wang; Candace M Kammerer; Stewart Anderson; Jiang Lu; Eleanor Feingold
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  Relationship between grip strength and bone mineral density in healthy Hong Kong adolescents.

Authors:  D C C Chan; W T K Lee; D H S Lo; J C S Leung; A W L Kwok; P C Leung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-03-29       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Influence of Body Composition, Oral Contraceptive Use, and Physical Activity on Bone Mineral Density in Premenopausal Women.

Authors:  Vanessa D Sherk; Clint D Howard; Michael G Bemben; Debra A Bemben
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2009-01-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.