Literature DB >> 15316151

The role of the zygomatic arch in the statics of the skull and its adaptive shape.

U Witzel1, H Preuschoft, H Sick.   

Abstract

The zygomatic arch of mammals is usually considered a phylogenetic relic of the fenestrations of the skull roof which may be observed in morphological sequences of primitive vertebrate skulls. If this concept is correct, the element is comparable (though not homologous) to the jugal arches of diapsid reptiles. Two major questions then remain unanswered: why different elements are maintained in reptiles and mammals during evolution, and why the arches are maintained as relics of ancestral forms. It is tempting to respond to the latter question with a very simple answer, namely that the elements function in order to sustain mechanical stresses. In this paper, we raise the questions which quality of stresses occurs in a primate skull within the zygomatic arches and what relationship these stresses hold to the morphology of these bony elements. An answer has been sought by means of finite element stress analysis. We found that the zygomatic arch in primate skulls represents a structure which carries, under all biologically relevant conditions, either compressive or tensile stresses. In a very simple model of the human skull under bite forces, a strip of stresses occurs lateral to the orbits, which seems roughly comparable to the zygomatic arch. Once such a structure exists and is used as an insertion of adductor muscles, it will be exposed to bending stress in side view and in frontal view. Morphological details of the zygomatic arch (curvature, profile, suture) are well suited to sustain the evoked stresses by a minimum of material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15316151     DOI: 10.1159/000078935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Folia Primatol (Basel)        ISSN: 0015-5713            Impact factor:   1.246


  4 in total

1.  Assessing mechanical function of the zygomatic region in macaques: validation and sensitivity testing of finite element models.

Authors:  K Kupczik; C A Dobson; M J Fagan; R H Crompton; C E Oxnard; P O'Higgins
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  The Biomechanics of Zygomatic Arch Shape.

Authors:  Amanda L Smith; Ian R Grosse
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Biomechanical implications of intraspecific shape variation in chimpanzee crania: moving toward an integration of geometric morphometrics and finite element analysis.

Authors:  Amanda L Smith; Stefano Benazzi; Justin A Ledogar; Kelli Tamvada; Leslie C Pryor Smith; Gerhard W Weber; Mark A Spencer; Paul C Dechow; Ian R Grosse; Callum F Ross; Brian G Richmond; Barth W Wright; Qian Wang; Craig Byron; Dennis E Slice; David S Strait
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Developmental constraint through negative pleiotropy in the zygomatic arch.

Authors:  Christopher J Percival; Rebecca Green; Charles C Roseman; Daniel M Gatti; Judith L Morgan; Stephen A Murray; Leah Rae Donahue; Jessica M Mayeux; K Michael Pollard; Kunjie Hua; Daniel Pomp; Ralph Marcucio; Benedikt Hallgrímsson
Journal:  Evodevo       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 2.250

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.