Literature DB >> 15315596

Impact of recombinant FSH dose adjustments on ovarian response in the second treatment cycle with IVF or ICSI in "standard" patients treated with 150 IU/day during the first cycle.

B Popovic-Todorovic1, A Loft, S Ziebe, A Nyboe Andersen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A dose of 150 IU/day of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) is commonly used as a "standard" dose for "standard" patients in the first in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment cycle. In the second cycle, the starting dose is adjusted in those patients who had an inappropriate response during the first cycle. The purpose of the study was to assess the impact of dose adjustments on ovarian response.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study including 567 first IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles using the long agonist protocol in "standard" patients. In the second cycle 385 patients who had failed to achieve an ongoing pregnancy were included. The starting dose in the second cycle was adjusted according to the response in the first cycle.
RESULTS: A total of 215 patients (55.8%) had altered starting dose in the second cycle: 193 (50.1%) received >150 IU/day, whereas 22 (5.7%) had <150 IU/day. In the group given >150 IU/day, significantly more follicles (9.8 vs. 8.3, p = 0.002) and oocytes (8.4 vs. 6.7, p <0.0001) were obtained in the second cycle. In the group given <150 IU/day, there were significantly fewer follicles (20.4 vs. 13.5, p <0.0001) and oocytes (16.4 vs. 11.4, p = 0.005) in the second cycle. In the group given <150 IU/day in the second cycle, six (27.3%) had an appropriate ovarian response (5-14 oocytes) in the first cycle compared to 14 (63.6%) women in the second cycle (p = 0.01). The ongoing pregnancy rates in all of the first (32.1%) and second cycles (27%) were similar (p = NS).
CONCLUSION: In a "standard" patient population, 55.8% needed an altered starting dose in the second cycle and rFSH dose adjustments had a significant impact on the ovarian response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15315596     DOI: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00573.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  5 in total

1.  Increased gonadotrophin stimulation does not improve IVF outcomes in patients with predicted poor ovarian reserve.

Authors:  Dharmawijaya N Lekamge; Michelle Lane; Robert B Gilchrist; Kelton P Tremellen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Testing for Ovarian Reserve in Assisted Reproduction programs: the current point of view.

Authors:  F J Broekmans
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2009

3.  A retrospective analysis of the follicle-stimulating hormone starting dose in expected normal responders undergoing their first in vitro fertilization cycle: proposed dose versus empiric dose.

Authors:  Dayong Lee; Soo Jin Han; Seul Ki Kim; Byung Chul Jee
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2018-11-30

4.  The OPTIMIST study: optimisation of cost effectiveness through individualised FSH stimulation dosages for IVF treatment. A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Theodora C van Tilborg; Marinus J C Eijkemans; Joop S E Laven; Carolien A M Koks; Jan Peter de Bruin; Gabrielle J Scheffer; Ron J T van Golde; Kathrin Fleischer; Annemieke Hoek; Annemiek W Nap; Walter K H Kuchenbecker; Petra A Manger; Egbert A Brinkhuis; Arne M van Heusden; Alexander V Sluijmer; Arie Verhoeff; Marcel H A van Hooff; Jaap Friederich; Jesper M J Smeenk; Janet Kwee; Harold R Verhoeve; Cornelis B Lambalk; Frans M Helmerhorst; Fulco van der Veen; Ben Willem J Mol; Helen L Torrance; Frank J M Broekmans
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Individualization of the FSH starting dose in IVF/ICSI cycles using the antral follicle count.

Authors:  Antonio La Marca; Valentina Grisendi; Simone Giulini; Cindy Argento; Alessandra Tirelli; Giulia Dondi; Enrico Papaleo; Annibale Volpe
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.234

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.