BACKGROUND: White matter lesions (WML) in elderly people co-occur with hypertension, depression, and cognitive impairment. Little is known about the density and distribution of WML in normal elderly people, whether they occur randomly in the aging brain or tend to cluster in certain areas, or whether patterns of WML aggregation are linked to clinical symptoms. OBJECTIVES: To describe patterns of WML distribution in a large representative population of elderly people using non-inferential cluster analysis; and to determine the extent to which such patterns are associated with clinical symptomatology. METHOD: A population sample of 1077 elderly people was recruited. Multiple analysis of correspondence followed by automatic classification methods was used to explore overall patterns of WML distribution. Correspondence was then sought between these patterns and a range of cerebrovascular, psychiatric, and neurological symptoms. RESULTS: Three distinct patterns of spatial localisation within the brain were observed, corresponding to distinct clusters of clinical symptoms. In particular WML aggregation in temporal and occipital areas was associated with greater age, hypertension, late onset depressive disorder, poor global cognitive function, and overall WML frequency. CONCLUSIONS: WML localisation is not random in the aging brain, and their distribution is associated with age and the presence of clinical symptoms. Age differences suggest there may be patterns of progression across time; however, this requires confirmation from longitudinal imaging studies.
BACKGROUND:White matter lesions (WML) in elderly people co-occur with hypertension, depression, and cognitive impairment. Little is known about the density and distribution of WML in normal elderly people, whether they occur randomly in the aging brain or tend to cluster in certain areas, or whether patterns of WML aggregation are linked to clinical symptoms. OBJECTIVES: To describe patterns of WML distribution in a large representative population of elderly people using non-inferential cluster analysis; and to determine the extent to which such patterns are associated with clinical symptomatology. METHOD: A population sample of 1077 elderly people was recruited. Multiple analysis of correspondence followed by automatic classification methods was used to explore overall patterns of WML distribution. Correspondence was then sought between these patterns and a range of cerebrovascular, psychiatric, and neurological symptoms. RESULTS: Three distinct patterns of spatial localisation within the brain were observed, corresponding to distinct clusters of clinical symptoms. In particular WML aggregation in temporal and occipital areas was associated with greater age, hypertension, late onset depressive disorder, poor global cognitive function, and overall WML frequency. CONCLUSIONS: WML localisation is not random in the aging brain, and their distribution is associated with age and the presence of clinical symptoms. Age differences suggest there may be patterns of progression across time; however, this requires confirmation from longitudinal imaging studies.
Authors: M M Breteler; J C van Swieten; M L Bots; D E Grobbee; J J Claus; J H van den Hout; F van Harskamp; H L Tanghe; P T de Jong; J van Gijn Journal: Neurology Date: 1994-07 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Lewis H Kuller; Oscar L Lopez; Anne Newman; Norman J Beauchamp; Greg Burke; Corinne Dulberg; Annette Fitzpatrick; Linda Fried; Mary N Haan Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2003 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Heidi I L Jacobs; Elizabeth C Leritz; Victoria J Williams; Martin P J Van Boxtel; Wim van der Elst; Jelle Jolles; Frans R J Verhey; Regina E McGlinchey; William P Milberg; David H Salat Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Muhammad Ayaz; Alexander S Boikov; E Mark Haacke; Daniel K Kido; Wolff M Kirsch Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: C J Aine; J E Bryant; J E Knoefel; J C Adair; B Hart; C H Donahue; R Montaño; R Hayek; C Qualls; D Ranken; J M Stephen Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-12-03 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Quan Zhang; Randall B Stafford; Ze Wang; Steven E Arnold; David A Wolk; John A Detre Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2012 Impact factor: 4.472