BACKGROUND: Vascular risk factors could play a role in the aetiology of Alzheimer's disease, but this has not been investigated in relation to neuroimaging findings OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the distribution of blood pressure and an indicator of atherosclerosis (pulse pressure) in patients with Alzheimer's disease with and without small vessel disease. METHODS: 152 Alzheimer patients underwent 1.0T MRI scanning. Blood pressure was measured with a sphygmomanometer. Small vessel disease was assessed by the presence of lacunar infarcts and white matter lesions. The distribution of blood pressure and pulse pressure, with or without small vessel disease, was assessed by linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Patients with small vessel disease had a higher blood pressure, a wider pulse pressure, and an increased prevalence of hypertension. These findings were strongly age dependent: for patients under 65, mean systolic blood pressure was higher in the subpopulation with small vessel disease than in those without (mean (SD): 149.9 (19.3) v 135.7 (20.5) mm Hg; p = 0.02). Hypertension was more common in patients with white matter lesions than in those without (75.6% v 45.1%; p = 0.03) and the pulse pressure was higher (61.9 (14.4) v 51.7 (11.5) mm Hg; p = 0.01). There was no relation between blood pressure and the degree of (sub)cortical and hippocampal atrophy in patients without small vessel disease. CONCLUSIONS: There was heterogeneity in Alzheimer's disease patients with respect to blood pressure and pulse pressure. Alzheimer's disease encompasses a heterogeneous group of disorders which share a common cognitive profile but with distinct radiological features with respect to white matter lesions.
BACKGROUND: Vascular risk factors could play a role in the aetiology of Alzheimer's disease, but this has not been investigated in relation to neuroimaging findings OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the distribution of blood pressure and an indicator of atherosclerosis (pulse pressure) in patients with Alzheimer's disease with and without small vessel disease. METHODS: 152 Alzheimerpatients underwent 1.0T MRI scanning. Blood pressure was measured with a sphygmomanometer. Small vessel disease was assessed by the presence of lacunar infarcts and white matter lesions. The distribution of blood pressure and pulse pressure, with or without small vessel disease, was assessed by linear regression analysis. RESULTS:Patients with small vessel disease had a higher blood pressure, a wider pulse pressure, and an increased prevalence of hypertension. These findings were strongly age dependent: for patients under 65, mean systolic blood pressure was higher in the subpopulation with small vessel disease than in those without (mean (SD): 149.9 (19.3) v 135.7 (20.5) mm Hg; p = 0.02). Hypertension was more common in patients with white matter lesions than in those without (75.6% v 45.1%; p = 0.03) and the pulse pressure was higher (61.9 (14.4) v 51.7 (11.5) mm Hg; p = 0.01). There was no relation between blood pressure and the degree of (sub)cortical and hippocampal atrophy in patients without small vessel disease. CONCLUSIONS: There was heterogeneity in Alzheimer's diseasepatients with respect to blood pressure and pulse pressure. Alzheimer's disease encompasses a heterogeneous group of disorders which share a common cognitive profile but with distinct radiological features with respect to white matter lesions.
Authors: F E de Leeuw; J C de Groot; M L Bots; J C Witteman; M Oudkerk; A Hofman; J van Gijn; M M Breteler Journal: J Neurol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Z Nagy; M M Esiri; K A Jobst; J H Morris; E M King; B McDonald; C Joachim; S Litchfield; L Barnetson; A D Smith Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Date: 1997-02 Impact factor: 3.685
Authors: Sarah E Vermeer; Tom Den Heijer; Peter J Koudstaal; Matthijs Oudkerk; Albert Hofman; Monique M B Breteler Journal: Stroke Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jan Cees De Groot; Frank-Erik De Leeuw; Matthijs Oudkerk; Jan Van Gijn; Albert Hofman; Jellemer Jolles; Monique M B Breteler Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Dannie Etiene; Joanny Kraft; Neema Ganju; Teresa Gomez-Isla; Brad Gemelli; Bradley T. Hyman; E. Tessa Hedley-Whyte; Jack R. Wands; Suzanne M. De La Monte Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Owen T Carmichael; L H Kuller; O L Lopez; P M Thompson; R A Dutton; A Lu; S E Lee; J Y Lee; H J Aizenstein; C C Meltzer; Y Liu; A W Toga; J T Becker Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2006-07-27 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Thomas T van Sloten; Athanase D Protogerou; Ronald M A Henry; Miranda T Schram; Lenore J Launer; Coen D A Stehouwer Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2015-03-28 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Michael J Firbank; Rebecca M Wiseman; Emma J Burton; Brian K Saxby; John T O'Brien; Gary A Ford Journal: J Neurol Date: 2007-04-20 Impact factor: 4.849