Literature DB >> 15313951

Comparison of coronary plaque rupture between stable angina and acute myocardial infarction: a three-vessel intravascular ultrasound study in 235 patients.

Myeong-Ki Hong1, Gary S Mintz, Cheol Whan Lee, Young-Hak Kim, Seung-Whan Lee, Jong-Min Song, Ki-Hoon Han, Duk-Hyun Kang, Jae-Kwan Song, Jae-Joong Kim, Seong-Wook Park, Seung-Jung Park.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the incidence and predictors of single and multiple plaque ruptures in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stable angina pectoris (SAP). METHODS AND
RESULTS: We performed 3-vessel intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) examination in 235 patients: 122 had AMI, and 113 had SAP. Plaque rupture of infarct-related or target lesions occurred in 80 AMI patients (66%) and in 31 SAP patients (27%) (P<0.001). Non-infarct-related or non-target artery plaque ruptures occurred in 21 AMI patients (17%) and 6 SAP patients (5%) (P=0.008). Multiple plaque ruptures were observed in 24 AMI (20%) and 7 SAP patients (6%) (P=0.004). Therefore, at least 1 plaque rupture in any coronary artery was noted in 84 AMI patients (69%) and 35 SAP patients (31%) (P<0.001). Overall, the only independent clinical predictor of plaque rupture in the infarct-related/target lesion was AMI (P<0.01; OR, 4.867; 95% CI, 2.734 to 8.661). The only independent clinical predictor of plaque rupture in AMI patients was an elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) level (P=0.035; OR, 2.139; 95% CI, 1.053 to 4.343). Conversely, in SAP patients, the only independent clinical predictor of plaque rupture was diabetes mellitus (P=0.034; OR, 2.553; 95% CI, 1.071 to 6.085). The only independent clinical predictor of multiple plaque ruptures was AMI (P=0.003; OR, 3.752; 95% CI, 1.546 to 9.105).
CONCLUSIONS: Three-vessel IVUS imaging showed that culprit lesion plaque rupture, secondary remote plaque ruptures, and multiple plaque ruptures were all more common in AMI patients than SAP patients. In AMI patients, plaque rupture was associated with a high CRP level, whereas in SAP patients, plaque rupture was more common in those with diabetes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15313951     DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000139858.69915.2E

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  41 in total

1.  Intravascular ultrasound appearance of scattered necrotic core as an index for deterioration of coronary flow during intervention in acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Kenji Sakata; Masa-aki Kawashiri; Hidekazu Ino; Takao Matsubara; Yoshihide Uno; Toshihiko Yasuda; Kenji Miwa; Honin Kanaya; Masakazu Yamagishi
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Association between three single nucleotide polymorphisms in eotaxin (CCL 11) gene, hexanucleotide repetition upstream, severity and course of coronary atherosclerosis.

Authors:  J Máchal; A Vašků; V Kincl; M Hlavna; V Bartáková; M Jurajda; J Meluzín
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Imaging techniques for the vulnerable coronary plaque.

Authors:  F Cademartiri; L La Grutta; A Palumbo; E Maffei; A Aldrovandi; R Malagò; F Alberghina; F Pugliese; G Runza; M Belgrano; M Midiri; M A Cova; G P Krestin
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Impact of arterial remodelling and plaque rupture on target and non-target lesion revascularisation after stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome: an intravascular ultrasound study.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Okura; Haruyuki Taguchi; Tomoichiro Kubo; Iku Toda; Minoru Yoshiyama; Junichi Yoshikawa; Kiyoshi Yoshida
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Plasma concentrations of molecular lipid species predict long-term clinical outcome in coronary artery disease patients.

Authors:  Sharda Anroedh; Mika Hilvo; K Martijn Akkerhuis; Dimple Kauhanen; Kaisa Koistinen; Rohit Oemrawsingh; Patrick Serruys; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Eric Boersma; Reijo Laaksonen; Isabella Kardys
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.922

Review 6.  Intravascular imaging of vulnerable coronary plaque: current and future concepts.

Authors:  Rishi Puri; Matthew I Worthley; Stephen J Nicholls
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 32.419

7.  Long-term safety and feasibility of three-vessel multimodality intravascular imaging in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the IBIS-4 (integrated biomarker and imaging study) substudy.

Authors:  Masanori Taniwaki; Maria D Radu; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Dik Heg; Henning Kelbæk; Lene Holmvang; Aris Moschovitis; Stephane Noble; Giovanni Pedrazzini; Kari Saunamäki; Jouke Dijkstra; Ulf Landmesser; Peter Wenaweser; Bernhard Meier; Giulio G Stefanini; Marco Roffi; Thomas F Lüscher; Stephan Windecker; Lorenz Räber
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Molecular imaging of plaque vulnerability.

Authors:  Sina Tavakoli; Aseem Vashist; Mehran M Sadeghi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  Non-cardiac surgery in patients with coronary artery disease: risk evaluation and periprocedural management.

Authors:  Davide Cao; Rishi Chandiramani; Davide Capodanno; Jeffrey S Berger; Matthew A Levin; Mary T Hawn; Dominick J Angiolillo; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency analysis of the lesion segment profile in ACS patients.

Authors:  Andreas König; Øyvind Bleie; Johannes Rieber; Philip Jung; Thomas M Schiele; Hae-Young Sohn; Marcus Leibig; Uwe Siebert; Volker Klauss
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.