Literature DB >> 15313801

Song function and the evolution of female preferences: why birds sing, why brains matter.

Stephen Nowicki1, William A Searcy.   

Abstract

Analyzing the function of song and its evolution as a communication signal provides an essential backdrop for understanding the physiological and neural mechanisms responsible for song learning, perception, and production. The reverse also is true-understanding the mechanisms underlying song learning provides insight into how song has evolved as a communication signal. Song has two primary functions: to repel other males from a defended space and to attract females and stimulate their courtship. The developmental stress hypothesis we present here builds on studies of the development of the song system to suggest how learned features of song, including complexity and local dialect structure, can serve as indicators of male quality useful to females in mate choice. The link between song and male quality depends on the fact that brain structures underlying song learning largely develop during the first few months post-hatching and that during this same period, songbirds are likely to be subject to nutritional and other developmental stresses. Individuals faring well in the face of stress are able to invest more resources to brain development and are expected to be correspondingly better at song learning. Learned features of song thus become reliable indicators of male quality, with reliability maintained by the developmental costs of song. Data from both field and laboratory studies are now beginning to provide broad support for the developmental stress hypothesis, illustrating the utility of connecting mechanistic and evolutionary analyses of song learning.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15313801     DOI: 10.1196/annals.1298.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  59 in total

Review 1.  Integrating perspectives on vocal performance and consistency.

Authors:  Jon T Sakata; Sandra L Vehrencamp
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Noradrenergic modulation of activity in a vocal control nucleus in vitro.

Authors:  Michele M Solis; David J Perkel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The mitonuclear compatibility hypothesis of sexual selection.

Authors:  Geoffrey E Hill; James D Johnson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Nest of origin predicts adult neuron addition rates in the vocal control system of the zebra finch.

Authors:  Patrick Hurley; Carolyn Pytte; John R Kirn
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 1.808

Review 5.  A songbird forebrain area potentially involved in auditory discrimination and memory formation.

Authors:  Raphael Pinaud; Thomas A Terleph
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Transgenic songbirds with suppressed or enhanced activity of CREB transcription factor.

Authors:  Kentaro Abe; Sumiko Matsui; Dai Watanabe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Brain-generated estradiol drives long-term optimization of auditory coding to enhance the discrimination of communication signals.

Authors:  Liisa A Tremere; Raphael Pinaud
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  How canaries listen to their song: Species-specific shape of auditory perception.

Authors:  Adam R Fishbein; Shelby L Lawson; Robert J Dooling; Gregory F Ball
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Control of central auditory processing by a brain-generated oestrogen.

Authors:  Raphael Pinaud; Liisa A Tremere
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Early-life immune activation increases song complexity and alters phenotypic associations between sexual ornaments.

Authors:  Loren Merrill; Madeleine F Naylor; Merria Dalimonte; Sean McLaughlin; Tara E Stewart; Jennifer L Grindstaff
Journal:  Funct Ecol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 5.608

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.