BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pediatric head and neck lesions can be difficult to characterize on clinical grounds alone. We investigated the use of dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography as a noninvasive adjunct for the assessment of the vascularity of these abnormalities. METHODS: Twelve patients (age range, 2 days to 16 years) with known or suspected vascular abnormalities were studied. Routine MR imaging, time-of-flight MR angiography, and MR digital subtraction angiography were performed in all patients. The dynamic sequence was acquired in two planes at one frame per second by using a thick section (6-10 cm) selective radio-frequency spoiled fast gradient-echo sequence and an IV administered bolus of contrast material. The images were subtracted from a preliminary mask sequence and viewed as a video-inverted cine loop. RESULTS: In all cases, MR digital subtraction angiography was successfully performed. The technique showed the following: 1) slow flow lesions (two choroidal angiomas, eyelid hemangioma, and scalp venous malformation); 2) high flow lesions that were not always suspected by clinical examination alone (parotid hemangioma, scalp, occipital, and eyelid arteriovenous malformations plus a palatal teratoma); 3) a hypovascular tumor for which a biopsy could be safely performed (Burkitt lymphoma); and 4) a hypervascular tumor of the palate (cystic teratoma). CONCLUSION: Our early experience suggests that MR digital subtraction angiography can be reliably performed in children of all ages without complication. The technique provided a noninvasive assessment of the vascularity of each lesion that could not always have been predicted on the basis of clinical examination or routine MR imaging alone.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pediatric head and neck lesions can be difficult to characterize on clinical grounds alone. We investigated the use of dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography as a noninvasive adjunct for the assessment of the vascularity of these abnormalities. METHODS: Twelve patients (age range, 2 days to 16 years) with known or suspected vascular abnormalities were studied. Routine MR imaging, time-of-flight MR angiography, and MR digital subtraction angiography were performed in all patients. The dynamic sequence was acquired in two planes at one frame per second by using a thick section (6-10 cm) selective radio-frequency spoiled fast gradient-echo sequence and an IV administered bolus of contrast material. The images were subtracted from a preliminary mask sequence and viewed as a video-inverted cine loop. RESULTS: In all cases, MR digital subtraction angiography was successfully performed. The technique showed the following: 1) slow flow lesions (two choroidal angiomas, eyelid hemangioma, and scalp venous malformation); 2) high flow lesions that were not always suspected by clinical examination alone (parotid hemangioma, scalp, occipital, and eyelid arteriovenous malformations plus a palatal teratoma); 3) a hypovascular tumor for which a biopsy could be safely performed (Burkitt lymphoma); and 4) a hypervascular tumor of the palate (cystic teratoma). CONCLUSION: Our early experience suggests that MR digital subtraction angiography can be reliably performed in children of all ages without complication. The technique provided a noninvasive assessment of the vascularity of each lesion that could not always have been predicted on the basis of clinical examination or routine MR imaging alone.
Authors: H Mori; S Aoki; T Okubo; N Hayashi; T Masumoto; T Yoshikawa; M Tago; M Shin; H Kurita; O Abe; K Ohtomo Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2002-11-29 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: J A Werner; A A Dünne; B J Folz; R Rochels; S Bien; A Ramaswamy; B M Lippert Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: P D Griffiths; N Hoggard; D J Warren; I D Wilkinson; B Anderson; C A Romanowski Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2000 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: S G Wetzel; R Haselhorst; D Bilecen; P A Lyrer; E Seifritz; G Bongartz; E W Radue; K Scheffler Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2001 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: D J Warren; N Hoggard; L Walton; M W Radatz; A A Kemeny; D M Forster; I D Wilkinson; P D Griffiths Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Manraj K S Heran; Francis Marshalleck; Michael Temple; Clement J Grassi; Bairbre Connolly; Richard B Towbin; Kevin M Baskin; Josee Dubois; Mark J Hogan; Sanjoy Kundu; Donald L Miller; Derek J Roebuck; Steven C Rose; David Sacks; Manrita Sidhu; Michael J Wallace; Darryl A Zuckerman; John F Cardella Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2010-02
Authors: Francesca Martino; Luis F Avila; Jose L Encinas; Ana L Luis; Pedro Olivares; Luis Lassaletta; Manuel Nistal; Juan A Tovar Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2006-07-13 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: Jia Wei Zheng; Ling Zhang; Qin Zhou; Hua Ming Mai; Yan An Wang; Xin Dong Fan; Zhong Ping Qin; Xv Kai Wang; Yi Fang Zhao Journal: Int J Clin Exp Med Date: 2013-10-25