Literature DB >> 15312926

Gender differences in the relationship of partner's social class to behavioural risk factors and social support in the Whitehall II study.

M Bartley1, P Martikainen, M Shipley, M Marmot.   

Abstract

In most countries health inequality in women appears to be greater when their socio-economic position is measured according to the occupation of male partners or spouses than the women's own occupations. Very few studies show social gradients in men's health according to the occupation of their female partners. This paper aims to explore the reasons for the differences in social inequality in cardiovascular disease between men and women by analysing the associations between own or spouses (or partners) socio-economic position and a set of risk factors for prevalent chronic diseases. Study participants were married or cohabiting London based civil servants included in the Whitehall II study. Socio-economic position of study participants was measured according to civil service grade; socio-economic position of the spouses and partners according to the Registrar General's social class schema. Risk factors were smoking, diet, exercise, alcohol consumption, and measures of social support. In no case was risk factor exposure more affected by the socio-economic position of a female partner than that of a male study participant. Wives' social class membership made no difference at all to the likelihood that male Whitehall participants were smokers, or took little exercise. Female participants' exercise and particularly smoking habit was, in contrast, related to their spouse's social class independently of their own grade of employment. Diet quality was affected equally by the socio-economic position of both male and female partners. Unlike the behavioural risk factors, the degree of social support reported by women participants was in general not strongly negatively affected by their husband or partner being in a less advantaged social class. However, non-employment in the husband or partner was associated with relatively lower levels of positive, and higher negative social support, while men with non-working wives or partners were unaffected. Studying gender differences in health inequality highlights some of the problems in health inequality research more broadly. We are brought face to face with the fact that the development of conceptual models that can be applied consistently to aetiology in both men and women are still at an early stage of development. Closer attention is needed to the different processes behind material power and 'emotional power' within the household when investigating gender differences in health and risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15312926     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  12 in total

1.  Preliminary evidence regarding the hypothesis that the sex ratio at sexual maturity may affect longevity in men.

Authors:  Lei Jin; Felix Elwert; Jeremy Freese; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2010-08

2.  Does the sex ratio at sexual maturity affect men's later-life mortality risks? Evidence from historical China.

Authors:  Emma Zang; Hui Zheng
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Risk stratification model to detect early pulmonary disease in infants with cystic fibrosis diagnosed by newborn screening.

Authors:  Lacrecia J Britton; Gabriela R Oates; Robert A Oster; Staci T Self; Robert B Troxler; Wynton C Hoover; Hector H Gutierrez; William T Harris
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2016-08-24

4.  The Importance of Spousal Education for the Self-Rated Health of Married Adults in the United States.

Authors:  Dustin C Brown; Robert A Hummer; Mark D Hayward
Journal:  Popul Res Policy Rev       Date:  2014-02-01

Review 5.  Socioeconomic inequalities in occupational, leisure-time, and transport related physical activity among European adults: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marielle A Beenackers; Carlijn B M Kamphuis; Katrina Giskes; Johannes Brug; Anton E Kunst; Alex Burdorf; Frank J van Lenthe
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 6.457

6.  Relative health effects of education, socioeconomic status and domestic gender inequity in Sweden: a cohort study.

Authors:  Susan P Phillips; Anne Hammarström
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Domestic work and psychological distress--what is the importance of relative socioeconomic position and gender inequality in the couple relationship?

Authors:  Lisa Harryson; Mattias Strandh; Anne Hammarström
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effectiveness of the combined approach for assessing social gradients in stroke risk among married women in Japan.

Authors:  Kaori Honjo; Hiroyasu Iso; Masahiko Iwata; Noriko Cable; Manami Inoue; Norie Sawada; Shoichiro Tsugane
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 3.211

9.  Effects of Individual, Spousal, and Offspring Socioeconomic Status on Mortality Among Elderly People in China.

Authors:  Lei Yang; Pekka Martikainen; Karri Silventoinen
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 3.211

10.  Father's education: an independent marker of risk for preterm birth.

Authors:  Philip M Blumenshine; Susan A Egerter; Moreen L Libet; Paula A Braveman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.