Literature DB >> 15312646

Normal greeble learning in a severe case of developmental prosopagnosia.

Bradley C Duchaine1, Kerry Dingle, Edward Butterworth, Ken Nakayama.   

Abstract

A central question in cognitive neuroscience is whether mechanisms exist that are specialized for particular domains. One of the most commonly cited examples of a domain-specific competence is the human ability to recognize upright faces. However, according to a widely discussed alternative hypothesis, face recognition is instead performed by mechanisms specialized for processing any object class for which an individual has expertise. Faces, according to this domain-general hypothesis, are just one example of an expert class. Nonface object expertise has been intensively investigated using a training procedure involving an artificial stimulus class known as greebles. A key prediction of this hypothesis is that individuals with face recognition impairments will also have impairments with other categories that control subjects have expertise with. Our results show that a man with severe prosopagnosia performed normally throughout the standard greeble training procedure. These findings indicate that face recognition and greeble recognition rely on separate mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15312646     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  12 in total

Review 1.  The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces.

Authors:  Nancy Kanwisher; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  A new look at domain specificity: insights from social neuroscience.

Authors:  Robert P Spunt; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Normal acquisition of expertise with greebles in two cases of acquired prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Constantin Rezlescu; Jason J S Barton; David Pitcher; Bradley Duchaine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A detailed investigation of facial expression processing in congenital prosopagnosia as compared to acquired prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Kate Humphreys; Galia Avidan; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Developmental prosopagnosia and super-recognition: no special role for surface reflectance processing.

Authors:  Richard Russell; Garga Chatterjee; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Configural and featural processing in humans with congenital prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Janek S Lobmaier; Jens Bölte; Fred W Mast; Christian Dobel
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-07-01

7.  Functional MRI reveals compromised neural integrity of the face processing network in congenital prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Galia Avidan; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Congenital prosopagnosia: multistage anatomical and functional deficits in face processing circuitry.

Authors:  V Dinkelacker; M Grüter; P Klaver; T Grüter; K Specht; S Weis; I Kennerknecht; C E Elger; G Fernandez
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Can training enhance face cognition abilities in middle-aged adults?

Authors:  Dominika Dolzycka; Grit Herzmann; Werner Sommer; Oliver Wilhelm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Early left-hemispheric dysfunction of face processing in congenital prosopagnosia: an MEG study.

Authors:  Christian Dobel; Christian Putsche; Pienie Zwitserlood; Markus Junghöfer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.