Literature DB >> 15312035

Repeatability indices for the Adams D-15 test for colour-normal and colour-defective adults.

Jeffery K Hovis1, Shankaran Ramaswamy, Matthew Anderson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Adams desaturated D-15 test was administered to individuals with normal colour vision or with congenital red-green colour vision defects to establish the repeatability of the test.
METHODS: One hundred subjects with normal colour vision and 64 subjects with defective colour vision participated in the study. Results were analysed from two different sessions to determine the repeatability of the test for different pass/fail criteria. The test was scored using both visual inspection of the score sheet and the modified Colour Difference Vector analysis (CDV) program.
RESULTS: For both subject groups, the repeatability was lowest when a perfect arrangement was required for a pass and improved as more errors were allowed. The improvement in repeatability was greatest as the failure criterion changed from 'any mistake' to 'more than two crossings'. The kappa coefficient for the reliability of the defect classification was 0.38 for visual inspection and 0.59 for the CDV analysis. All the protans who failed the test at both sessions were classified correctly.
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 98 per cent of the colour-normals and 82 per cent of the colour-defectives would have the same pass/fail outcome on the Adams D-15 test conducted several days apart when the failure criterion was either one or more or two or more crossings. Individuals who make less than four crossings on the Adams D-15 should repeat the test to ensure confidence in the pass/fail result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15312035     DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2004.tb05062.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Optom        ISSN: 0816-4622            Impact factor:   2.742


  4 in total

1.  Color vision and neuroretinal function in diabetes.

Authors:  B E Wolff; M A Bearse; M E Schneck; K Dhamdhere; W W Harrison; S Barez; A J Adams
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Comparison of panel D-15 tests in a large older population.

Authors:  Marilyn E Schneck; Gunilla Haegerstrom-Portnoy; Lori A Lott; John A Brabyn
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 3.  A critical review: Psychophysical assessments of diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Xing D Chen; Thomas W Gardner
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 6.048

4.  Reduced Discrimination in the Tritanopic Confusion Line for Congenital Color Deficiency Adults.

Authors:  Marcelo F Costa; Paulo R K Goulart; Mirella T S Barboni; Dora F Ventura
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.