Literature DB >> 15310767

Determinants of tumor response and survival with erlotinib in patients with non--small-cell lung cancer.

Román Pérez-Soler1, Abraham Chachoua, Lisa A Hammond, Eric K Rowinsky, Mark Huberman, Daniel Karp, James Rigas, Gary M Clark, Pedro Santabárbara, Philip Bonomi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Erlotinib is a highly specific epidermal growth factor receptor (HER1/EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor. This phase II study of erlotinib in patients with HER1/EGFR-expressing non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy evaluated tumor response, survival, and symptom improvement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-seven patients received an oral, continuous daily dose of 150 mg of erlotinib. Assessments of objective response used WHO and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30, supplemented with a lung cancer module, Quality of Life Questionnaire LC13, was used to measure health-related quality of life. Additional analyses were performed to identify predictors of response and survival.
RESULTS: The objective response rate was 12.3% (95% CI, 5.1% to 23.7%). Responses were observed regardless of type or number of prior chemotherapy regimens. Median survival time was 8.4 months (95% CI, 4.8 to 13.9 months), and the 1-year survival rate was 40% (95% CI, 28% to 54%). Erlotinib therapy was associated with tumor-related symptom improvement. The drug was well tolerated; drug-related cutaneous rash and diarrhea were observed in 75% and 56% of patients, respectively. One patient experienced toxicity consisting of severe grade 3 rash and diarrhea. Time since diagnosis and good performance status were significant predictors of survival in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, whereas HER1/EGFR staining intensity was not. Additionally, survival correlated with the occurrence and severity of rash.
CONCLUSION: Erlotinib was active and well tolerated in this patient population, and further clinical development is clearly warranted. Cutaneous rash seems to be a surrogate marker of clinical benefit, but this finding should be confirmed in ongoing and future studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15310767     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.11.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  235 in total

1.  Management of skin toxicity associated with cetuximab treatment in combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

Authors:  Carmine Pinto; Carlo Antonio Barone; Giampiero Girolomoni; Elvio Grazioso Russi; Marco Carlo Merlano; Daris Ferrari; Evaristo Maiello
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-01-27

Review 2.  Imaging of lung cancer in the era of molecular medicine.

Authors:  Mizuki Nishino; David M Jackman; Hiroto Hatabu; Pasi A Jänne; Bruce E Johnson; Annick D Van den Abbeele
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Enhancing diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic outcome prediction of gliomas using genomics.

Authors:  Mahfoud Assem; Zita Sibenaller; Supreet Agarwal; Maha S Al-Keilani; Mohammad A Y Alqudah; Timothy C Ryken
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2012-03

4.  Bilateral anterior uveitis secondary to erlotinib.

Authors:  Lik Thai Lim; Robert Alexander Blum; Chee Peng Cheng; Abdul Hanifudin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 5.  Targeted therapies for non-small cell lung cancer: an evolving landscape.

Authors:  Sumanta Kumar Pal; Robert A Figlin; Karen Reckamp
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 6.  Evaluation of antiangiogenic efficacy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Biomarkers and functional imaging.

Authors:  Mohamed Bouattour; Audrey Payancé; Johanna Wassermann
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-09-18

Review 7.  The predictive role of skin rash with cetuximab and panitumumab in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published trials.

Authors:  F Petrelli; K Borgonovo; S Barni
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 8.  Capturing and Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes into Clinical Trials: Practical Considerations for Clinicians.

Authors:  Juliana Perez Botero; Gita Thanarajasingam; Rahma Warsame
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  A phase I/II trial of trastuzumab plus erlotinib in metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer: a dual ErbB targeted approach.

Authors:  Carolyn D Britten; Richard S Finn; Linda D Bosserman; Steven G Wong; Michael F Press; Mubashira Malik; Bert L Lum; Dennis J Slamon
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 10.  Non-small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship.

Authors:  Julian R Molina; Ping Yang; Stephen D Cassivi; Steven E Schild; Alex A Adjei
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.