BACKGROUND: Little is known about sperm recovery and ICSI using testicular sperm from men with non-obstructive azoospermia who had a previous orchidopexy. We therefore studied the sperm recovery in this subgroup and evaluated clinical parameters predicting successful sperm retrieval and the outcome of ICSI. METHODS: A total of 79 non-obstructive azoospermic men with a history of orchidopexy underwent a sperm recovery procedure. The predictive value of clinical parameters such as age at sperm retrieval, age at orchidopexy, testicular volume, FSH, FSH/LH ratio, testosterone and androgen sensitivity index (LH x testosterone) for successful testicular sperm retrieval was evaluated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. A comparison between 64 ICSI cycles performed in these couples and 92 cycles performed in couples in which the men had an unexplained non-obstructive azoospermia was carried out. RESULTS: Testicular spermatozoa were recovered in 41 patients (52%). The mean age at orchidopexy of the patients with a positive sperm recovery was 10.6 years [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.3-13.8] versus 15.5 years (95% CI 11.3-19.8) for those where no spermatozoa were found. The mean testicular volume of the largest testis of patients with spermatozoa found was 10 ml (95% CI 8.3-11.9) versus 8.5 ml (95% CI 5.8-11.1) in patients with no spermatozoa found. The mean FSH and testosterone value for patients with successful and unsuccessful sperm recovery, respectively, was 24.1 IU/l (95% CI 17.9-30.3) and 4.4 ng/ml (95% CI 3.7-5.1) versus 28.8 IU/l (95% CI 19.4-38.2) and 3.4 ng/ml (95% CI 2.2-4.5). All clinical and biological parameters examined failed to predict the outcome of the testicular sperm extraction. No differences were observed between the orchidopexy and unexplained group for the number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, embryo quality, pregnancy rate and implantation rate. CONCLUSIONS: As in the population of men with non-obstructive azoospermia, the sperm recovery rate for patients with a history of orchidopexy is approximately 50% and there are currently no clinical parameters predicting successful sperm retrieval in this subpopulation of patients. The outcome of the ICSI cycles is comparable with that in the population of men with non-obstructive azoospermia.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about sperm recovery and ICSI using testicular sperm from men with non-obstructive azoospermia who had a previous orchidopexy. We therefore studied the sperm recovery in this subgroup and evaluated clinical parameters predicting successful sperm retrieval and the outcome of ICSI. METHODS: A total of 79 non-obstructive azoospermic men with a history of orchidopexy underwent a sperm recovery procedure. The predictive value of clinical parameters such as age at sperm retrieval, age at orchidopexy, testicular volume, FSH, FSH/LH ratio, testosterone and androgen sensitivity index (LH x testosterone) for successful testicular sperm retrieval was evaluated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. A comparison between 64 ICSI cycles performed in these couples and 92 cycles performed in couples in which the men had an unexplained non-obstructive azoospermia was carried out. RESULTS: Testicular spermatozoa were recovered in 41 patients (52%). The mean age at orchidopexy of the patients with a positive sperm recovery was 10.6 years [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.3-13.8] versus 15.5 years (95% CI 11.3-19.8) for those where no spermatozoa were found. The mean testicular volume of the largest testis of patients with spermatozoa found was 10 ml (95% CI 8.3-11.9) versus 8.5 ml (95% CI 5.8-11.1) in patients with no spermatozoa found. The mean FSH and testosterone value for patients with successful and unsuccessful sperm recovery, respectively, was 24.1 IU/l (95% CI 17.9-30.3) and 4.4 ng/ml (95% CI 3.7-5.1) versus 28.8 IU/l (95% CI 19.4-38.2) and 3.4 ng/ml (95% CI 2.2-4.5). All clinical and biological parameters examined failed to predict the outcome of the testicular sperm extraction. No differences were observed between the orchidopexy and unexplained group for the number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, embryo quality, pregnancy rate and implantation rate. CONCLUSIONS: As in the population of men with non-obstructive azoospermia, the sperm recovery rate for patients with a history of orchidopexy is approximately 50% and there are currently no clinical parameters predicting successful sperm retrieval in this subpopulation of patients. The outcome of the ICSI cycles is comparable with that in the population of men with non-obstructive azoospermia.