| Literature DB >> 15310401 |
Elmar Saathoff1, Annette Olsen, Jane D Kvalsvig, Chris C Appleton.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Geohelminth infection is a major health problem of children from rural areas of developing countries. In an attempt to reduce this burden, the Department of Health of the province of KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) established in 1998 a programme for helminth control that aimed at regularly treating primary school children for schistosomiasis and intestinal helminths. This article describes the baseline situation and the effect of treatment on geohelminth infection in a rural part of the province.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15310401 PMCID: PMC514548 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-4-27
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Figure 1Location of the study area in northern KwaZulu-Natal
Figure 2Map of the study area
Figure 3Long-term monthly averages of rainfall and temperature in the area. Data from 1966 to 1990 for Makatini research station, about 30 km south of the study area [35].
Prevalence and intensity (EPG) of geohelminth infection at baseline
| Males | Females | M/F Ratio* (95%CI or | |
| n = | 445 | 572 | |
| Median Age (Inter quartile range) | 11.2 (10.1–12.3) | 10.7 (9.7–11.8) | |
| Prevalence (%) | |||
| Hookworm | 86.5 | 80.6 | 1.07 (1.02 to 1.13) |
| 15.7 | 22.2 | 0.71 (0.54 to 0.92) | |
| 57.3 | 57.2 | 1.00 (0.90 to 1.12) | |
| Mean Intensity (EPG)† | |||
| Hookworm | 984 | 792 | 1.24 ( |
| 876 | 2948 | 0.30 ( | |
| 240 | 332 | 0.72 ( |
* Male to Female ratios for prevalence and mean intensity of infection and 95% confidence interval (for prevalence) or P-value of 2-sided Mann-Whitney-U-test (for differences in mean EPG). † Arithmetic mean EPG including uninfected pupils.
Figure 4Cumulative prevalence of geohelminth infection at baseline (n = 1017). The prevalence of infection > = any intensity threshold of interest can be read from the percentage scale (x-axis). 10 EPG correspond to one egg on one of two slides, the minimum for a positive reading. Thus the intersection of each graph with the x-axis corresponds to the total prevalence of infection of the respective helminth.
Cure rates and egg reduction rates at three weeks after the first and after the second treatment with 400 mg albendazole (n = 592)*
| Hookworm | |||
| Prevalence (%) | |||
| Baseline Survey | 82.9 | 22.0 | 59.8 |
| After Treatment 1 | 17.6 | 0.8 | 52.2 |
| After Treatment 2 | 5.7 | 0.5 | 39.9 |
| Cure rate (%) | |||
| 1 Treatment | 78.8 | 96.4 | 12.7 |
| 2 Treatments | 93.2 | 97.7 | 33.3 |
| Arithmetic Mean EPG† | |||
| Baseline Survey | 881 | 2213 | 319 |
| After Treatment 1 | 60 | 52 | 240 |
| After Treatment 2 | 11 | 3 | 166 |
| ERR (%) | |||
| 1 Treatment | 93.2 | 97.7 | 24.8 |
| 2 Treatments | 98.8 | 99.8 | 47.8 |
* Including only pupils who participated in both treatments, the baseline survey and in the surveys directly after the first and second treatment and calculated only using the first of two samples that were obtained in the post-treatment surveys. † Calculated including uninfected children.
Development of prevalence and intensity after one and after two rounds of treatment with 400 mg albendazole*
| Post-Treatment 1‡ | Re-infection 1 | Post-Treatment 2‡ | Re-infection 2a | Re-infection 2b | |
| n = | 801 | 790 | 803 | 739 | 731 |
| Time of survey | May/Jun 98 | Aug 98 | Oct/Nov 98 | Feb 99 | Apr/May 99 |
| Weeks since last treatment | 3 | 16 | 3 | 18 | 29 |
| Prevalence (%) | |||||
| Hookworm | 21.2 | 24.8 | 10.1 | 24.6 | 36.7 |
| | 1.0 | 4.3 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 8.6 |
| | 54.6 | 50.9 | 44.0 | 44.8 | 43.4 |
| Mean intensity (EPG)† | |||||
| Hookworm | 77 | 184 | 14 | 65 | 139 |
| | 55 | 115 | 3 | 59 | 351 |
| | 227 | 215 | 116 | 174 | 175 |
* Included are all pupils who participated in both treatments (n = 864) and in the respective survey (n given in table). Calculated using both samples that were obtained in each survey. † Arithmetic mean EPG for all pupils including uninfected. ‡ The two treatments were administered in April and October 1998 respectively.