Literature DB >> 15309900

The effect of hyaluronan-based agents on adhesion formation in an intraabdominal sepsis model.

Acar Tüzüner1, Mehmet Ayhan Kuzu, Bariş Akin, Serdar Karaca, Selçuk Hazinedaroglu.   

Abstract

Because of the technical difficulty during subsequent surgical intervention, adhesion remains the most important predictor of outcome in the staged procedures following emergent colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term effects of hyaluronan (HA)-based adhesion barriers 3 months following the infectious insult to the peritoneal cavity. Wistar albino rats were divided into three sham and four infectious groups, each consisting of 20 rats. Sham groups consisted of a control group (I), which had undergone manipulation of the cecum in the first operation and saline irrigation following the cecal resection in the second operation; an HA-based bioresorbable membrane (BM) group (II), in which 20 x 20- and 35 x 25-mm pieces of HA-based bioresorbable membrane were placed over the cecectomy area and under the midline incision, respectively, with other conditions the same as for the control (I) group; and an HA-based solution (S) group (II), where HA solution was used as an irrigation solution, with other conditions the same as for the control group (I). Infectious groups consisted of a septic group (IV), which had undergone cecal ligation and puncture in the first operation and saline irrigation following the cecal resection in the second operation; a sepsis + HA-BM group (V), in which two sheets of membrane were applied, with other conditions the same as for the septic group (IV); a sepsis + HA-S group (VI), in which HA solution was used as an irrigation solution, with conditions otherwise the same as for the septic group (IV); and a sepsis + HA-BM + HA-S group (VII), where HA solution was used as an irrigation solution and two sheets of membrane were applied, with other conditions the same as for the septic group (IV). At the end of the 3-month period, mortality, septic complications, and intraabdominal adhesions (adhesion scores and adhesion tensile strength measurements) were recorded. Significantly denser adhesions were found in the septic group (IV) when compared to the others (P < 0.001). HA-S significantly reduced not only the incidence of adhesion but also the adhesion tensile strength in infectious groups (P < 0.001 compared to the sepsis group). However, HA-BM significantly reduced adhesion tensile strength only. Irrigation of the peritoneal cavity with HA-S may prove to be useful to shorten the reversal time period and decrease morbidity following staged procedures for intraabdominal sepsis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15309900     DOI: 10.1023/b:ddas.0000034571.30602.36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  30 in total

1.  Effect of surgical adhesion reduction devices on the propagation of experimental intra-abdominal infection.

Authors:  A O Tzianabos; R L Cisneros; J Gershkovich; J Johnson; R J Miller; J W Burns; A B Onderdonk
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-11

Review 2.  Adhesiolysis.

Authors:  A Hershlag; M P Diamond; A H DeCherney
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.190

3.  Morbidity and mortality of ostomy closure.

Authors:  D M Mosdell; R C Doberneck
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 4.  Postoperative adhesions: their treatment and relevance in clinical practice.

Authors:  D Menzies
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Fibrinolytic activity in the abdominal cavity of rats with faecal peritonitis.

Authors:  H van Goor; J S de Graaf; J Grond; W J Sluiter; J van der Meer; V J Bom; R P Bleichrodt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Sepsis and septic shock--a review of laboratory models and a proposal.

Authors:  K A Wichterman; A E Baue; I H Chaudry
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  H Ellis; B J Moran; J N Thompson; M C Parker; M S Wilson; D Menzies; A McGuire; A M Lower; R J Hawthorn; F O'Brien; S Buchan; A M Crowe
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Prevention of intra-abdominal abscesses and adhesions using a hyaluronic acid solution in a rat peritonitis model.

Authors:  M M Reijnen; J F Meis; V A Postma; H van Goor
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-09

Review 9.  Colostomy closure. Ochsner Clinic experience.

Authors:  D A Khoury; D E Beck; F G Opelka; T C Hicks; A E Timmcke; J B Gathright
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 10.  Reversal of Hartmann's procedure: effect of timing and technique on ease and safety.

Authors:  J O Keck; B T Collopy; P J Ryan; R Fink; J R Mackay; R J Woods
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  2 in total

1.  Experimental study evaluating the effect of a barrier method on postoperative intraabdominal adhesions.

Authors:  Axel Schneider; Joachim Bennek; Kasper Ø Olsen; Joachim Weiss; Wolfgang Schmidt; Udo Rolle
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Development of a standardized laparoscopic caecum resection model to simulate laparoscopic appendectomy in rats.

Authors:  Philipp Lingohr; Jonas Dohmen; Hanno Matthaei; Timo Schwandt; Gun-Soo Hong; Nils Konieczny; Edwin Bölke; Sven Wehner; Jörg C Kalff
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.175

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.