Literature DB >> 15309896

The efficacy and limitations of sirolimus conversion in liver transplant patients who develop renal dysfunction on calcineurin inhibitors.

Patrick Lam1, Atsushi Yoshida, Kimberly Brown, Marwan Abouljoud, Iman Bajjoka, Fadi Dagher, Dilip K Moonka.   

Abstract

This study evaluates sirolimus in preserving renal function in 28 patients who developed renal insufficiency after liver transplantation. Patients with a creatinine level higher than 1.8 mg/ml were eligible for conversion. Of the 28 patients, 7 (25%) did not tolerate sirolimus, 6 (21%) progressed to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and 14 (50%) have been maintained on sirolimus with stable renal function. The 28 patients overall had a decline in creatinine of 0.38 mg/dl (P = 0.029) at week 4, with a small increase by week 24. However, the subset of 14 patients who did not develop ESRD had a decline in creatinine that persisted to week 48. While the differences between those who developed ESRD and those with stable renal function were not statistically significant, the patients who developed ESRD had a higher creatinine at conversion (2.8 vs 2.3) and a lower creatinine clearance (36 vs 53 ml/min). Patients receiving sirolimus had a persistent rise in cholesterol (P < 0.05). The use of sirolimus to preserve renal function was limited by patients unable to tolerate drug- (25%) and patients who developed ESRD (21%). A subgroup of patients (50%) had an improvement in creatinine that persisted for 48 weeks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15309896     DOI: 10.1023/b:ddas.0000034567.53748.df

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  10 in total

1.  Improvement of acute and chronic renal dysfunction in liver transplant patients after substitution of calcineurin inhibitors by mycophenolate mofetil.

Authors:  A Barkmann; B Nashan; H H Schmidt; K H Böker; N Emmanouilidis; J Rosenau; M J Bahr; M W Hoffmann; M P Manns; J Klempnauer; H J Schlitt
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 2.  Hypertension and renal dysfunction in long-term liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  T A Gonwa
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  Conversion of liver transplant recipients on cyclosporine with renal impairment to mycophenolate mofetil.

Authors:  J I Herrero; J Quiroga; B Sangro; M Girala; N Gómez-Manero; F Pardo; J Alvárez-Cienfuegos; J Prieto
Journal:  Liver Transpl Surg       Date:  1999-09

4.  Sirolimus: a potent new immunosuppressant for liver transplantation.

Authors:  C J Watson; P J Friend; N V Jamieson; T W Frick; G Alexander; A E Gimson; R Calne
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1999-02-27       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Experience with the use of sirolimus in liver transplantation--use in patients for whom calcineurin inhibitors are contraindicated.

Authors:  G J Chang; H D Mahanty; D Quan; C E Freise; N L Ascher; J P Roberts; P G Stock; R Hirose
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.799

6.  Long-term medical complications in patients surviving > or = 5 years after liver transplant.

Authors:  P A Sheiner; J F Magliocca; C A Bodian; L Kim-Schluger; G Altaca; J V Guarrera; S Emre; T M Fishbein; S R Guy; M E Schwartz; C M Miller
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  End-stage renal disease (ESRD) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTX) using calcineurin-based immunotherapy: risk of development and treatment.

Authors:  T A Gonwa; M L Mai; L B Melton; S R Hays; R M Goldstein; M F Levy; G B Klintmalm
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2001-12-27       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Cyclosporine-associated chronic nephropathy.

Authors:  B D Myers; J Ross; L Newton; J Luetscher; M Perlroth
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-09-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Sirolimus monotherapy in nephrotoxicity due to calcineurin inhibitors in liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Satheesh Nair; James Eason; George Loss
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.799

10.  Chronic renal dysfunction late after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Ari J Cohen; Mark D Stegall; Charles B Rosen; Russell H Wiesner; Nelson Leung; Walter K Kremers; Nizar N Zein
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.799

  10 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Overview of immunosuppression in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Anjana A Pillai; Josh Levitsky
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Sirolimus monotherapy versus sirolimus in combination with steroids and/or MMF for immunosuppression after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Anurag Maheshwari; Michael S Torbenson; Paul J Thuluvath
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Conversion to sirolimus immunosuppression in liver transplantation recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Report of an initial experience.

Authors:  Jian Zhou; Jia Fan; Zheng Wang; Zhi-Quan Wu; Shuang-Jian Qiu; Xiao-Wu Huang; Yao Yu; Jian Sun; Yong-Sheng Xiao; Yi-Feng He; Yu-Qi Wang; Zhao-You Tang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  [Progress in immunosuppression].

Authors:  C P Strassburg; M J Bahr; T Becker; J Klempnauer; M P Manns
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Calcineurin-inhibitor minimization in liver transplant patients with calcineurin-inhibitor-related renal dysfunction: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuan Kong; Dongping Wang; Yushu Shang; Wenhua Liang; Xiaoting Ling; Zhiyong Guo; Xiaoshun He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  The Role of mTOR Inhibitors in Liver Transplantation: Reviewing the Evidence.

Authors:  Goran B Klintmalm; Björn Nashan
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2014-02-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.