Literature DB >> 15309676

Comparison between closed-loop portal and peripheral venous insulin delivery systems for an artificial endocrine pancreas.

Taiji Sekigami1, Seiya Shimoda, Kenro Nishida, Yasuto Matsuo, Shinji Ichimori, Kenshi Ichinose, Motoaki Shichiri, Michiharu Sakakida, Eiichi Araki.   

Abstract

To establish the ideal insulin delivery route for an artificial endocrine pancreas, we examined the effectiveness of closed-loop portal insulin delivery. We investigated the effects of the route of insulin delivery on net hepatic glucose balance (NHGB) in dogs under pancreatic clamp conditions with somatostatin plus basal glucagon and insulin infusions. A constant rate of suprabasal insulin was infused via the portal vein or a peripheral vein, and glucose was infused into the portal vein for 180 min. The mean net hepatic glucose uptake (NHGU) values in the portal insulin infusion group (PI group) were significantly greater than those in the peripheral venous insulin infusion group (VI group); the changes from the baseline values at 180 min were 3.54 +/- 0.66 and 2.45 +/- 0.82 mg kg(-1) min(-1) in the PI and VI groups, respectively, P < 0.05. Furthermore, dogs under pancreatic clamp conditions were controlled after a 2-g/kg oral glucose load by applying the closed-loop intraportal (PO) or intravenous (IV) insulin infusion algorithm. There were no significant differences in glycemic control and insulin requirements between these algorithms. However, the maximum peripheral venous and arterial plasma insulin concentrations with the PO algorithm were significantly lower than those with the IV algorithm [305.1 +/- 68.9 and 468.1 +/- 66.9 pmol/l (peripheral vein) and 305.3 +/- 62.9 and 469.6 +/- 85.1 pmol/l (artery) with the PO and IV algorithms, respectively, P < 0.05]. On the other hand, the maximum portal plasma insulin concentration with the PO algorithm was significantly higher than that with the IV algorithm (619.9 +/- 101.7 and 414.3 +/- 79.9 pmol/l with the PO and IV algorithms, respectively, P < 0.05). The mean NHGU values with the PO algorithm were significantly greater than those with the IV algorithm. Our results confirmed that closed-loop portal insulin delivery is feasible with regard to both insulin profiles and hepatic glucose handling in vivo, and indicated that the portal vein is the most suitable insulin delivery route for the artificial endocrine pancreas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15309676     DOI: 10.1007/s10047-004-0251-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Artif Organs        ISSN: 1434-7229            Impact factor:   1.731


  9 in total

Review 1.  Intraoperative glycemic control procedures and the use of an artificial pancreas.

Authors:  Koichi Yamashita; Tomoaki Yatabe
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Comparison of the physiological relevance of systemic vs. portal insulin delivery to evaluate whole body glucose flux during an insulin clamp.

Authors:  Tiffany D Farmer; Erin C Jenkins; Tracy P O'Brien; Gregory A McCoy; Allison E Havlik; Erik R Nass; Wendell E Nicholson; Richard L Printz; Masakazu Shiota
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 4.310

Review 3.  Pursuit of a perfect insulin.

Authors:  Alexander N Zaykov; John P Mayer; Richard D DiMarchi
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  Insulin adsorption on functionalized silica surfaces: an accelerated molecular dynamics study.

Authors:  Marjan A Nejad; Herbert M Urbassek
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  The artificial pancreas: how sweet engineering will solve bitter problems.

Authors:  David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-01

6.  A Run-to-Run Control Strategy to Adjust Basal Insulin Infusion Rates in Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Cesar C Palerm; Howard Zisser; Lois Jovanovič; Francis J Doyle
Journal:  J Process Control       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.666

Review 7.  What is artificial endocrine pancreas? Mechanism and history.

Authors:  Kenro Nishida; Seiya Shimoda; Kenshi Ichinose; Eiichi Araki; Motoaki Shichiri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Intelligent automated drug administration and therapy: future of healthcare.

Authors:  Richa Sharma; Dhirendra Singh; Prerna Gaur; Deepak Joshi
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 4.617

9.  Recent challenges in insulin delivery systems: a review.

Authors:  M M Al-Tabakha; A I Arida
Journal:  Indian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.975

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.