BACKGROUND: In order to assess the preventive effects of right atrial septal pacing on atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with sinus node dysfunction, we conducted a prospective randomized controlled study in patients requiring atrial pacing. METHODS: The inclusion criterion was the presence of a sinus node dysfunction with or without episodes of AF. Pacing sites were randomized to either the right atrial septum or appendage. Patients with permanent AF or with atrioventricular (AV) block without sinus node dysfunction were excluded. Patients were discharged at a pacing rate of 65 beats per minute after setting of the optimal AV delay. The antiarrhythmic therapy remained unchanged until the first recurrence of AF. Sequential analyses were performed with the triangular test. RESULTS: Mean baseline characteristics were not different between the septum (n = 57) and the appendage (n = 67) groups. The triangular test evidenced a lack of effect of septal pacing at the last sequential analysis. The rates of AF-free survival were not different between the septum and the appendage group (65% vs 64%, P =.28). In the subgroup of patients with at least 1 episode of AF 3 months before pacing, AF-free survival was increased by atrial septal pacing (70% vs 40%, P =.018). The mean follow-up was 16 +/- 13 months (range, 1-54). CONCLUSIONS:Atrial septal pacing does not have a preventive effect on the occurrence of AF in patient requiring atrial pacing for sinus node dysfunction. Subgroup analysis suggests that atrial septal pacing may benefit patients with >or=1 episode of AF in the 3 months preceding pacing.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: In order to assess the preventive effects of right atrial septal pacing on atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with sinus node dysfunction, we conducted a prospective randomized controlled study in patients requiring atrial pacing. METHODS: The inclusion criterion was the presence of a sinus node dysfunction with or without episodes of AF. Pacing sites were randomized to either the right atrial septum or appendage. Patients with permanent AF or with atrioventricular (AV) block without sinus node dysfunction were excluded. Patients were discharged at a pacing rate of 65 beats per minute after setting of the optimal AV delay. The antiarrhythmic therapy remained unchanged until the first recurrence of AF. Sequential analyses were performed with the triangular test. RESULTS: Mean baseline characteristics were not different between the septum (n = 57) and the appendage (n = 67) groups. The triangular test evidenced a lack of effect of septal pacing at the last sequential analysis. The rates of AF-free survival were not different between the septum and the appendage group (65% vs 64%, P =.28). In the subgroup of patients with at least 1 episode of AF 3 months before pacing, AF-free survival was increased by atrial septal pacing (70% vs 40%, P =.018). The mean follow-up was 16 +/- 13 months (range, 1-54). CONCLUSIONS:Atrial septal pacing does not have a preventive effect on the occurrence of AF in patient requiring atrial pacing for sinus node dysfunction. Subgroup analysis suggests that atrial septal pacing may benefit patients with >or=1 episode of AF in the 3 months preceding pacing.
Authors: Mark S Link; Derek V Exner; Mark Anderson; Michael Ackerman; Amin Al-Ahmad; Bradley P Knight; Steven M Markowitz; Elizabeth S Kaufman; David Haines; Samuel J Asirvatham; David J Callans; J Paul Mounsey; Frank Bogun; Sanjiv M Narayan; Andrew D Krahn; Suneet Mittal; Jagmeet Singh; John D Fisher; Sumeet S Chugh Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2011-06-14 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Chance M Witt; Charles J Lenz; Henry H Shih; Elisa Ebrille; Andrew N Rosenbaum; Htin Aung; Martin van Zyl; Kevin K Manocha; Abhishek J Deshmukh; David O Hodge; Siva K Mulpuru; Yong-Mei Cha; Raul E Espinosa; Samuel J Asirvatham; Christopher J McLeod Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2016-09-09 Impact factor: 1.900