Literature DB >> 15308882

The JNC 7 approach compared to conventional treatment in diabetic patients with hypertension: a double-blind trial of initial monotherapy vs. combination therapy.

Jonathan C Fox1, Kellie Leight, Santosh C Sutradhar, Laura A Demopoulos, Gilbert W Gleim, Andrew J Lewin, George L Bakris.   

Abstract

The JNC 7 states that persons with blood pressure (BP) more than 20/10 mm Hg above goal should be started on combination drug therapy. This criterion includes patients with BP >160/100 mm Hg and diabetics with hypertension. The goal BP for persons with diabetes mellitus is <130/80 mm Hg. A randomized, double-blind trial force titrated initial combination therapy utilizing an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) combination (losartan/hydrochlorothiazide [LOS/HCTZ]) compared with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (ramipril), for 8 weeks, and tested the hypothesis that combination therapy is more likely to achieve goal BP vs. monotherapy. At 4 weeks, 30.5% of LOS/HCTZ and 14.4% of ramipril recipients achieved goal diastolic BP (p<0.001). More participants achieved goal systolic BP in the ARB/HCTZ group at 4 weeks (29.8% vs. 14.4%; p<0.001). At 4 weeks, mean diastolic BP had decreased 10.2+/-7.4 mm Hg in the LOS/HCTZ group compared with 6.4+/-6.8 mm Hg in the ramipril group (p<0.001), and systolic BP had fallen 15.4+/-13.1 mm Hg in the ARB/HCTZ compared with 9.2+/-10.2 mm Hg in the ACE-inhibitor group (p<0.001). Significant differences favoring the combination were also noted at 8 weeks. Drug-related adverse experiences were 10.3% for the combination compared with 12.7% for the monotherapy group. Initial combination therapy with an ARB/HCTZ was more effective than ACE-inhibitor monotherapy in achieving BP goals in participants with diabetes with no significant differences in the incidence of adverse experiences. These observations confirm other studies of combination therapies, such as b blocker/diuretic, ACE inhibitor/diuretic, or ACE inhibitor/calcium channel blocker. The use of two medications will achieve goal BP in more patients than monotherapy. This observation is important in treatment of high-risk patients with diabetes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15308882      PMCID: PMC8109344          DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2004.03488.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  16 in total

1.  Daily regimen and compliance with treatment.

Authors:  B S Bloom
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-22

Review 2.  Standards of medical care in diabetes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Comparative analysis of two rates.

Authors:  O Miettinen; M Nurminen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1985 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  Preserving renal function in adults with hypertension and diabetes: a consensus approach. National Kidney Foundation Hypertension and Diabetes Executive Committees Working Group.

Authors:  G L Bakris; M Williams; L Dworkin; W J Elliott; M Epstein; R Toto; K Tuttle; J Douglas; W Hsueh; J Sowers
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  Risk stratification in hypertension: new insights from the Framingham Study.

Authors:  W B Kannel
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.689

6.  Prevalence of high blood pressure and elevated serum creatinine level in the United States: findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988-1994).

Authors:  J Coresh; G L Wei; G McQuillan; F L Brancati; A S Levey; C Jones; M J Klag
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2001-05-14

7.  Poor control of risk factors for vascular disease among adults with previously diagnosed diabetes.

Authors:  Sharon H Saydah; Judith Fradkin; Catherine C Cowie
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Diabetes, other risk factors, and 12-yr cardiovascular mortality for men screened in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.

Authors:  J Stamler; O Vaccaro; J D Neaton; D Wentworth
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. HOT Study Group.

Authors:  L Hansson; A Zanchetti; S G Carruthers; B Dahlöf; D Elmfeldt; S Julius; J Ménard; K H Rahn; H Wedel; S Westerling
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-06-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Achieving goal blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes: conventional versus fixed-dose combination approaches.

Authors:  George L Bakris; Matthew R Weir
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.738

View more
  4 in total

1.  Control and management of hypertension at a university health centre in oman.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Almahrezi; Ibrahim Al-Zakwani; Ayman Al-Aamri; Samia Al-Khaldi; Nisrin Al-Zadjali; Mohammed Al-Hatali; Abdullah Al-Shukeili
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2008-07

2.  Prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension in primary care settings in Al seeb wilayat, oman.

Authors:  Rashid Al-Saadi; Sulaiman Al-Shukaili; Suleiman Al-Mahrazi; Zakiya Al-Busaidi
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2011-08-15

3.  Addition of angiotensin receptor blockade or mineralocorticoid antagonism to maximal angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  Uzma F Mehdi; Beverley Adams-Huet; Philip Raskin; Gloria L Vega; Robert D Toto
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 4.  Management strategies for patients with hypertension and diabetes: why combination therapy is critical.

Authors:  Sara Giunti; Mark Cooper
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.