Literature DB >> 1530871

Laparoscopic varicocelectomy: preliminary report of a new technique.

P G Hagood1, D J Mehan, J H Worischeck, C H Andrus, R O Parra.   

Abstract

The use of varicocelectomy for the treatment of subfertility seems to be incontrovertible. However, there is a difference of opinion as to the proper surgical method of varicocele ablation. The inguinal and high retroperitoneal approaches are the most commonly accepted methods to date. However, significant postoperative morbidity is common and return to normal activity often is prolonged. Also, bilateral operations are being performed more commonly. These considerations have prompted many to search for alternative techniques. We developed a laparoscopic procedure that is as simple and effective as more traditional methods. In addition, it offers lower morbidity, allows for microscopic dissection with preservation of the spermatic artery and is amenable to bilateral ligation without a second incision. Ten patients 16 to 54 years old underwent laparoscopic ligation of the spermatic veins at the internal inguinal ring. The diagnosis was based on physical examination. Indications for the operation were infertility with a stress sperm pattern in 5 patients, testicular atrophy in 4 and scrotal pain in 1. Four patients underwent bilateral ligation. Preliminary followup showed resolution of the varicocele in all patients and disappearance of pain in the patient treated for this symptom. No morbidity related to this procedure has been encountered and all patients resumed normal activity within 2 days. We believe that this new method is a viable alternative for varicocelectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1530871     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37137-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  14 in total

1.  Laparoscopic surgery in urology.

Authors:  H Ozkara; L R Watson
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Varicocele: A Review.

Authors:  Brian F Baigorri; Robert G Dixon
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 3.  Safety and effectiveness of the different types of embolic materials for the treatment of testicular varicoceles: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gregory C Makris; Evgenia Efthymiou; Mark Little; Phillip Boardman; Susan Anthony; Raman Uberoi; Charles Tapping
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Surgical approaches for varicocele in pediatric patient.

Authors:  Alejandra Parrilli; Agnese Roberti; Maria Escolino; Ciro Esposito
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2016-10

5.  Lap simulator, animal studies, and the Laptent. Bridging the gap between open and laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  T O Henkel; D M Potempa; J Rassweiler; B C Manegold; P Alken
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Japanese experience with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Isao Hara; Gaku Kawabata
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Laparoscopic varicocele ligation.

Authors:  H Fuse; A Okumura; M Sakamoto; S Ohta; T Katayama
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Laparoscopic versus open high ligation of the testicular veins for the treatment of varicocele.

Authors:  G A Bebars; A Zaki; A R Dawood; M A El-Gohary
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2000 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Laparoscopic varicocelectomy: virtual reality training and learning curve.

Authors:  Zheng Wang; Yuhua Ni; Yinan Zhang; Xunbo Jin; Qinghua Xia; Hanbo Wang
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 10.  Should laparoscopy be the standard approach used for pelvic lymph node dissection?

Authors:  J C Kim; G S Gerber
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.