A Y Peleg1, M L Woods. 1. Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. A.Peleg@alfred.org.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether a continuous infusion of amphotericin B (CI-AmB) is less nephrotoxic than a 4 h infusion in haematology patients with fever and neutropenia, including bone-marrow transplant recipients. Efficacy was assessed as a secondary end-point. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study over a 2 year period. A total of 1073 haematology admissions were reviewed (98.3% complete) and 81 admissions were eligible for study entry; 39 received CI-AmB and 42 a 4 h infusion of AmB. RESULTS: Renal impairment occurred significantly less frequently with CI-AmB compared with a 4 h infusion of AmB [10% versus 45%, respectively, odds ratio (OR) 0.14; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04-0.5, P < 0.001]. The difference was maintained among allogeneic transplant recipients (P = 0.007) and patients receiving concurrent nephrotoxic drugs (P < 0.001). An AmB infusion rate of <0.08 mg/kg/h was associated with a significant reduction in renal impairment (P < 0.001). A difference in survival was observed between the continuous and 4 h infusion of AmB (95% versus 79%, respectively, OR 5.1; 95% CI 1.02-25.1, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: CI-AmB appears to be significantly less nephrotoxic than 4 h infusion AmB in haematology patients with fever and neutropenia--including high-risk bone-marrow transplant recipients--without increasing mortality. An AmB infusion rate of <0.08 mg/kg/h appears to be a safe threshold, associated with reduced renal impairment.
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether a continuous infusion of amphotericin B (CI-AmB) is less nephrotoxic than a 4 h infusion in haematology patients with fever and neutropenia, including bone-marrow transplant recipients. Efficacy was assessed as a secondary end-point. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study over a 2 year period. A total of 1073 haematology admissions were reviewed (98.3% complete) and 81 admissions were eligible for study entry; 39 received CI-AmB and 42 a 4 h infusion of AmB. RESULTS:Renal impairment occurred significantly less frequently with CI-AmB compared with a 4 h infusion of AmB [10% versus 45%, respectively, odds ratio (OR) 0.14; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04-0.5, P < 0.001]. The difference was maintained among allogeneic transplant recipients (P = 0.007) and patients receiving concurrent nephrotoxic drugs (P < 0.001). An AmB infusion rate of <0.08 mg/kg/h was associated with a significant reduction in renal impairment (P < 0.001). A difference in survival was observed between the continuous and 4 h infusion of AmB (95% versus 79%, respectively, OR 5.1; 95% CI 1.02-25.1, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS:CI-AmB appears to be significantly less nephrotoxic than 4 h infusion AmB in haematology patients with fever and neutropenia--including high-risk bone-marrow transplant recipients--without increasing mortality. An AmB infusion rate of <0.08 mg/kg/h appears to be a safe threshold, associated with reduced renal impairment.
Authors: Kevin J Downes; Molly Hayes; Julie C Fitzgerald; Gwendolyn M Pais; Jiajun Liu; Nicole R Zane; Stuart L Goldstein; Marc H Scheetz; Athena F Zuppa Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Francesco G De Rosa; Pierpaolo Terragni; Daniela Pasero; Anna C Trompeo; Rosario Urbino; Anna Barbui; Giovanni Di Perri; V Marco Ranieri Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-06-16 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Chris Stockmann; Jonathan E Constance; Jessica K Roberts; Jared Olson; Elizabeth H Doby; Krow Ampofo; Justin Stiers; Michael G Spigarelli; Catherine M T Sherwin Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 6.447