Literature DB >> 15307980

Guidelines for operative vaginal birth.

Yvonne M Cargill, Catherine Jane MacKinnon, Marc-Yvon Arsenault, Elias Bartellas, Sue Daniels, Tom Gleason, Stuart Iglesias, Michael C Klein, Carolyn A Lane, Marie-Jocelyne Martel, Ann E Sprague, Ann Roggensack, Ann Kathleen Wilson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide guidelines for operative vaginal birth in the management of the second stage of labour. OPTIONS: Non-operative techniques, episiotomy, and Caesarean section are compared to operative vaginal birth. outcome: Reduced fetal and maternal morbidity and mortality. EVIDENCE: MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched using the key words 'vacuum' and 'birth' as well as 'forceps' and 'birth' for literature published in English from January 1970 to June 2004. The level of evidence and quality of recommendations made are described using the Evaluation of Evidence from the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Non-operative interventions such as one-to-one support, partogram use, oxytocin use, and delayed pushing in women using epidurals will decrease need for operative birth. (I-A) 2. Manual rotation may be used alone or in conjunction with instrumental birth with little or no increased risk to the pregnant woman or to the fetus. (III-B) 3. Routine episiotomy is not necessary for an assisted vaginal birth. (II-1E) 4. When operative intervention in the second stage of labour is required, the options, risks, and benefits of vacuum, forceps, and Caesarean section must be considered. The choice of intervention needs to be individualized, as one is not clearly safer or more effective than the other. (II-B) 5. Failure of the chosen method, vacuum and/or forceps, to achieve delivery of the fetus in a reasonable time should be considered an indication for abandonment of the method. (III-C) 6. Adequate clinical experience and appropriate training of the operator are essential to the safe performance of operative deliveries. Hospital credentialing boards should grant privileges for performing these techniques only to an appropriately trained individual who demonstrates adequate skills. (III-C). VALIDATION: The Clinical Practice Obstetrics Committee and Executive and Council of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada approved these guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15307980     DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30647-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can        ISSN: 1701-2163


  8 in total

1.  A comparative study of feto-maternal outcome in instrumental vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Abha Singh; Pratibha Rathore
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2012-01-17

2.  Family physician and obstetrician episiotomy rates in low-risk obstetrics in southern Alberta.

Authors:  Andrea Hargrove; Kristy Penner; Tyler Williamson; Sue Ross
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth.

Authors:  Hong Jiang; Xu Qian; Guillermo Carroli; Paul Garner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-08

4.  Naegele Forceps Delivery and Association between Morbidity and the Number of Forceps Traction Applications: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Naoki Matsumoto; Toshifumi Takenaka; Nobuyuki Ikeda; Satoshi Yazaki; Yuichi Sato
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2015-09-03

5.  DECIDE: a cluster randomized controlled trial to reduce non-medically indicated caesareans in Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Charles Kaboré; Valéry Ridde; Séni Kouanda; Ludovic Queuille; Paul-André Somé; Isabelle Agier; Alexandre Dumont
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Prophylactic antibiotics in the prevention of infection after operative vaginal delivery (ANODE): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Marian Knight; Virginia Chiocchia; Christopher Partlett; Oliver Rivero-Arias; Xinyang Hua; Kim Hinshaw; Derek Tuffnell; Louise Linsell; Edmund Juszczak
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Midline and Mediolateral Episiotomy: Risk Assessment Based on Clinical Anatomy.

Authors:  Danielle K Garner; Akash B Patel; Jun Hung; Monica Castro; Tamar G Segev; Jeffrey H Plochocki; Margaret I Hall
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-02

8.  How did episiotomy rates change from 2007 to 2014? Population-based study in France.

Authors:  Karine Goueslard; Jonathan Cottenet; Adrien Roussot; Christophe Clesse; Paul Sagot; Catherine Quantin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.