Literature DB >> 1530763

The relationship between back pain and lead apron use in radiologists.

B Moore1, E vanSonnenberg, G Casola, R A Novelline.   

Abstract

Anecdotal experience has suggested that back pain in radiologists may result from extensive wearing of lead aprons. To investigate this possibility, we sent questionnaires to 688 radiologists in various subspecialties whose use of lead aprons varied from none to moderate to extensive. The questionnaire included both objective items that quantitated apron use and back pain and subjective items that asked, for example, if the respondent believed that lead aprons were responsible for his or her back pain. We received 236 responses (34% response rate). Objective data from those radiologists who had experienced no back pain before wearing a lead apron (179 radiologists, 26% of those surveyed) were tabulated; respondents were grouped according to age, time spent wearing a lead apron, and degree of back pain. Odds ratios were calculated. Answers to subjective questions for all respondents were tabulated. Back pain was reported by 52% of those who estimated their lead apron use at greater than or equal to 10 hr per week, the mean response, as opposed to 46% of those who wore lead aprons fewer than 10 hr a week. These and related results were not statistically significant. Our study does not prove that wearing a lead apron is a significant risk factor for the development of back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1530763     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.158.1.1530763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  18 in total

1.  Low back pain, lead aprons, and the angiographer.

Authors:  D M Pelz
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Protective aprons in imaging departments: manufacturer stated lead equivalence values require validation.

Authors:  M Finnerty; P C Brennan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-03-24       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  On the (f)utility of measuring the lead equivalence of protective garments.

Authors:  A Kyle Jones; Louis K Wagner
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Level of knowledge on radiation exposure and compliance to wearing protective equipment: where do endourologists stand? An ESUT/EULIS survey.

Authors:  Lazaros Tzelves; Bhaskar Somani; Thomas Knoll; Guido Kamphuis; Kemal Sarica; C Seitz; E Liatsikos; Andreas Skolarikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Current attitudes of Turkish anesthesiologists to radiation exposure.

Authors:  Adnan Tüfek; Orhan Tokgöz; Ilker Öngüç Aycan; Feyzi Çelik; Abdurrahman Gümüş
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Fluoroless catheter ablation in adults: a single center experience.

Authors:  J Mauricio Sánchez; Margaret A Yanics; Patricia Wilson; Amit Doshi; Thomas Kurian; Stephen Pieper
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Assessment of the Radiation Attenuation Properties of Several Lead Free Composites by Monte Carlo Simulation.

Authors:  M Kazempour; M Saeedimoghadam; F Shekoohi Shooli; N Shokrpour
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2015-06-01

8.  Evaluation of the effectiveness of X-ray protective aprons in experimental and practical fields.

Authors:  Hiroshige Mori; Kichiro Koshida; Osamu Ishigamori; Kosuke Matsubara
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-12-13

Review 9.  Review of musculoskeletal injuries and prevention in the endoscopy practitioner.

Authors:  Glenn Harvin
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.062

Review 10.  Ergonomics in Interventional Radiology: Awareness Is Mandatory.

Authors:  Francois H Cornelis; Leo Razakamanantsoa; Mohamed Ben Ammar; Raphael Lehrer; Idriss Haffaf; Sanaa El-Mouhadi; Francois Gardavaud; Milan Najdawi; Matthias Barral
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.