Literature DB >> 15305838

Is there an upper limit of intracranial pressure in patients with severe head injury if cerebral perfusion pressure is maintained?

Jeffrey S Young1, Osbert Blow, Florence Turrentine, Jeffrey A Claridge, Andrew Schulman.   

Abstract

Authors of recent studies have championed the importance of maintaining cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) to prevent secondary brain injury following traumatic head injury. Data from these studies have provided little information regarding outcome following severe head injury in patients with an intracranial pressure (ICP) greater than 40 mm Hg, however, in July 1997 the authors instituted a protocol for the management of severe head injury in patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score lower than 9. The protocol was focused on resuscitation from acidosis, maintenance of a CPP greater than 60 mm Hg through whatever means necessary as well as elevation of the head of the bed, mannitol infusion, and ventriculostomy with cerebrospinal fluid drainage for control of ICP. Since the institution of this protocol, nine patients had a sustained ICP greater than 40 mm Hg for 2 or more hours, and five of these had an ICP greater than 75 mm Hg on insertion of the ICP monitor and later experienced herniation and expired within 24 hours. Because of the severe nature of the injuries demonstrated on computerized tomography scans and their physical examinations, these patients were not aggressively treated under this protocol. The authors vigorously attempted to maintain a CPP greater than 60 mm Hg with intensive fluid resuscitation and the administration of pressor agents in the four remaining patients who had developed an ICP higher than 40 mm Hg after placement of the ICP monitor. Two patients had an episodic ICP greater than 40 mm Hg for more than 36 hours, the third patient had an episodic ICP greater than of 50 mm Hg for more than 36 hours, and the fourth patient had an episodic ICP greater than 50 mm Hg for more than 48 hours. On discharge, all four patients were able to perform normal activities of daily living with minimal assistance and experience ongoing improvement. Data from this preliminary study indicate that intense, aggressive management of CPP can lead to good neurological outcomes despite extremely high ICP. Aggressive CPP therapy should be performed and maintained even though apparently lethal ICP levels may be present. Further study is needed to support these encouraging results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15305838     DOI: 10.3171/foc.2003.15.6.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  12 in total

Review 1.  Intracranial pressure monitoring for traumatic brain injury in the modern era.

Authors:  Llewellyn C Padayachy; Anthony A Figaji; M R Bullock
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Continuous optical monitoring of cerebral hemodynamics during head-of-bed manipulation in brain-injured adults.

Authors:  Meeri N Kim; Brian L Edlow; Turgut Durduran; Suzanne Frangos; Rickson C Mesquita; Joshua M Levine; Joel H Greenberg; Arjun G Yodh; John A Detre
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Electric versus manual tooth brushing among neuroscience ICU patients: is it safe?

Authors:  Virginia Prendergast; Peter Hagell; Ingalill Rahm Hallberg
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Interaction between brain chemistry and physiology after traumatic brain injury: impact of autoregulation and microdialysis catheter location.

Authors:  Ivan Timofeev; Marek Czosnyka; Keri L H Carpenter; Jurgens Nortje; Peter J Kirkpatrick; Pippa G Al-Rawi; David K Menon; John D Pickard; Arun K Gupta; Peter J Hutchinson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Severe traumatic brain injury in Austria IV: intensive care management.

Authors:  Walter Mauritz; Ivan Janciak; Ingrid Wilbacher; Martin Rusnak
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.704

6.  A Method of Managing Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Absence of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: The Imaging and Clinical Examination Protocol.

Authors:  Randall M Chesnut; Nancy Temkin; Sureyya Dikmen; Carlos Rondina; Walter Videtta; Gustavo Petroni; Silvia Lujan; Victor Alanis; Antonio Falcao; Gustavo de la Fuenta; Luis Gonzalez; Manuel Jibaja; Arturo Lavarden; Freddy Sandi; Roberto Mérida; Ricardo Romero; Jim Pridgeon; Jason Barber; Joan Machamer; Kelley Chaddock
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Effects of the neurological wake-up test on intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure in brain-injured patients.

Authors:  Karin Skoglund; Per Enblad; Niklas Marklund
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 3.210

8.  Critical thresholds for cerebrovascular reactivity after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  E Sorrentino; J Diedler; M Kasprowicz; K P Budohoski; C Haubrich; P Smielewski; J G Outtrim; A Manktelow; P J Hutchinson; J D Pickard; D K Menon; M Czosnyka
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 9.  Intracranial pressure monitoring: fundamental considerations and rationale for monitoring.

Authors:  Randall Chesnut; Walter Videtta; Paul Vespa; Peter Le Roux
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 10.  Current concepts of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Hemanshu Prabhakar; Kavita Sandhu; Hemant Bhagat; Padmaja Durga; Rajiv Chawla
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.