BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that a significant number of men with normal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels have prostate carcinoma. Whether malignancies in such men are associated with better outcomes is unclear. The authors compared the risk of biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (RP) between men with normal PSA levels and men with elevated PSA levels. METHODS: Data were examined from 1582 men who underwent RP between 1988 and 2002 at 1 of 5 equal-access medical centers. Patients were segregated into groups based on serum PSA levels (with stratification according to age-specific reference ranges). Clinical and pathologic characteristics and biochemical outcome data were compared across groups using analyses of variance, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: Men who had normal PSA levels had significantly fewer high-grade tumors compared with men who had higher PSA levels (P < 0.001). The former group had a significantly decreased incidence of positive surgical margins, extracapsular disease, seminal vesicle invasion, and lymph node involvement (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, only serum PSA level (P < 0.001) and biopsy Gleason score (P < 0.001) predicted the time to disease recurrence. When only men with serum PSA levels < 10 ng/mL were examined, PSA level treated as a continuous variable remained a significant predictor of time to biochemical failure (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Men who had normal PSA levels had significantly fewer high-grade tumors and significantly better biochemical outcomes after undergoing RP compared with men who had elevated PSA levels. Overall, men with normal PSA levels who undergo RP represent a favorable risk group.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that a significant number of men with normal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels have prostate carcinoma. Whether malignancies in such men are associated with better outcomes is unclear. The authors compared the risk of biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (RP) between men with normal PSA levels and men with elevated PSA levels. METHODS: Data were examined from 1582 men who underwent RP between 1988 and 2002 at 1 of 5 equal-access medical centers. Patients were segregated into groups based on serum PSA levels (with stratification according to age-specific reference ranges). Clinical and pathologic characteristics and biochemical outcome data were compared across groups using analyses of variance, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS:Men who had normal PSA levels had significantly fewer high-grade tumors compared with men who had higher PSA levels (P < 0.001). The former group had a significantly decreased incidence of positive surgical margins, extracapsular disease, seminal vesicle invasion, and lymph node involvement (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, only serum PSA level (P < 0.001) and biopsy Gleason score (P < 0.001) predicted the time to disease recurrence. When only men with serum PSA levels < 10 ng/mL were examined, PSA level treated as a continuous variable remained a significant predictor of time to biochemical failure (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS:Men who had normal PSA levels had significantly fewer high-grade tumors and significantly better biochemical outcomes after undergoing RP compared with men who had elevated PSA levels. Overall, men with normal PSA levels who undergo RP represent a favorable risk group.
Authors: Thomas Steuber; Andrew J Vickers; Alexander Haese; Charlotte Becker; Kim Pettersson; Felix K-H Chun; Michael W Kattan; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Hartwig Huland; Hans Lilja Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2006-03-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: M Bonet; A Merglen; G Fioretta; E Rapiti; I Neyroud-Caspar; R Zanetti; R Miralbell; C Bouchardy Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Marius Kinčius; Aivaras Jonas Matjošaitis; Darius Trumbeckas; Ramūnas Mickevičius; Daimantas Milonas; Mindaugas Jievaltas Journal: Cent European J Urol Date: 2011-03-18