Effect of hand dominance on bone mass measurement in sedentary individuals.

The aim of this study was to determine in healthy sedentary subjects the effect of hand dominance on side-to-side difference in bone area and bone mass for upper and lower extremities. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of both forearms and hips were performed on 193 right-handed and 20 left-handed subjects as determined by self-report. Scan acquisition and scan analyses were performed by one investigator, but all scan pairs were independently assessed for symmetry of positioning and movement artifacts by three investigators. Results show that DXA measurements between sides may be highly correlated regardless of the symmetry of the scan pair. However, asymmetric DXA scan pairs may have more than twice the side-to-side difference found in symmetric DXA scan pairs at the hip. Side-to-side differences between subregions were greater than the differences between measurements at the total radius, ulna, or hip. For symmetric pairs of DXA scans, the dominant forearm has significantly higher bone area and bone mineral content (BMC). Bone mineral density (BMD) was significantly higher only in the ulna of the dominant forearm. However, the nondominant forearm has higher values than dominant forearm in at least one DXA measurement in >24% of the subjects. There were no significant differences in any DXA measurements between hips, and higher DXA measurements did not occur significantly more frequently at the hip corresponding to the dominant hand. We conclude that healthy sedentary subjects tend to have proportionally higher bone area and BMC in the dominant forearm that results in similar BMD between dominant and nondominant forearms. This relationship does not appear to be applicable to measurements at the hip. In addition, there is a significant proportion of subjects with higher bone area and BMC in the nondominant extremities. Thus, in sedentary subjects, the consistency in the use of same extremity and the consistency in scan acquisition techniques and scan analyses is of greater importance than the selection of an extremity based on hand dominance in DXA studies.