OBJECTIVES: Few of the questionnaires available for evaluating the function and clinical state of the elbow have been validated. An ideal score would be consistent, sensitive, reliable and elbow-specific, incorporating both patient perception and clinician assessment. This was our aim. METHODS: Items were generated using 25 patients and expert opinion, and reduced using 25 new patients to yield a nine-item patient questionnaire and a six-item clinical evaluation (of strength, motion and ulnar nerve involvement). This was validated using 63 new patients (of whom 28 were studied twice without therapy and 18 were studied again after appropriate surgery). RESULTS: The test-retest reliability coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.93) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.98) were both good. Convergent validity was attested by good correlations with other scores, the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) (physical) (R2 = 0.62 and 0.29, P < 0.0005). Sensitivity to change was demonstrated by correlating preoperative-postoperative changes to those in DASH and NHP (physical) (R2 = 0.50 and 0.27, P < 0.04). CONCLUSION: This is a reliable, internally consistent score, correlating well with other, non-elbow specific scores and sensitive to change on treatment.
OBJECTIVES: Few of the questionnaires available for evaluating the function and clinical state of the elbow have been validated. An ideal score would be consistent, sensitive, reliable and elbow-specific, incorporating both patient perception and clinician assessment. This was our aim. METHODS: Items were generated using 25 patients and expert opinion, and reduced using 25 new patients to yield a nine-item patient questionnaire and a six-item clinical evaluation (of strength, motion and ulnar nerve involvement). This was validated using 63 new patients (of whom 28 were studied twice without therapy and 18 were studied again after appropriate surgery). RESULTS: The test-retest reliability coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.93) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.98) were both good. Convergent validity was attested by good correlations with other scores, the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) (physical) (R2 = 0.62 and 0.29, P < 0.0005). Sensitivity to change was demonstrated by correlating preoperative-postoperative changes to those in DASH and NHP (physical) (R2 = 0.50 and 0.27, P < 0.04). CONCLUSION: This is a reliable, internally consistent score, correlating well with other, non-elbow specific scores and sensitive to change on treatment.
Authors: Matthew V Smith; Ryan P Calfee; Keith M Baumgarten; Robert H Brophy; Rick W Wright Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Marc Beirer; Henrik Friese; Andreas Lenich; Moritz Crönlein; Gunther H Sandmann; Peter Biberthaler; Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Sebastian Siebenlist Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2015-05-17 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Jill Dawson; Helen Doll; Irene Boller; Ray Fitzpatrick; Christopher Little; Jonathan Rees; Andrew Carr Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2008-10-29 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Marie Badalamente; Laureen Coffelt; John Elfar; Glenn Gaston; Warren Hammert; Jerry Huang; Lisa Lattanza; Joy Macdermid; Greg Merrell; David Netscher; Zubin Panthaki; Greg Rafijah; Douglas Trczinski; Brent Graham Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 2.230
Authors: Lindsey C Sheffler; Lisa Lattanza; Mitell Sison-Williamson; Michelle A James Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 5.284