Literature DB >> 15304434

The performance of young deaf children in spatial and temporal number tasks.

Yael Zarfaty1, Terezinha Nunes, Peter Bryant.   

Abstract

Deaf children tend to fall behind in mathematics at school. This problem may be a direct result of particular experiences in the classroom; for example, deaf children may find it hard to follow teachers' presentations of basic, but nevertheless quite abstract, mathematical ideas. Another possibility is that the problem starts before school: They may either be worse than hearing children at early, nonlinguistic number representations, they may be behind in learning the culturally transmitted number string, or both. This may result in deaf children failing to develop informal problem-solving strategies, which prepare most children for the more formal learning of number and arithmetic that they will have to do at school. We compared 3- and 4-year-old deaf and hearing children's ability to remember and to reproduce the number of items in a set of objects. In one condition, we presented all the items together in a spatial array; in another, we presented them one at a time in a temporal sequence. Deaf children performed as well as the hearing children in the temporal tasks, but outperformed their hearing counterparts in the spatial task. These results suggest that preschool deaf children's number representation is at least as advanced as that of hearing children, and that they are actually better than hearing children at representing the number of objects in spatial arrays. We conclude that deaf children's difficulties with mathematical learning are not a consequence of a delay in number representation. We also conclude that deaf children should benefit from mathematical instruction that emphasizes spatial representation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15304434     DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enh034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ        ISSN: 1081-4159


  9 in total

1.  Understanding Language, Hearing Status, and Visual-Spatial Skills.

Authors:  Marc Marschark; Linda J Spencer; Andreana Durkin; Georgianna Borgna; Carol Convertino; Elizabeth Machmer; William G Kronenberger; Alexandra Trani
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2015-07-03

2.  The gestures ASL signers use tell us when they are ready to learn math.

Authors:  Susan Goldin-Meadow; Aaron Shield; Daniel Lenzen; Melissa Herzig; Carol Padden
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-03-14

Review 3.  Routes to short-term memory indexing: lessons from deaf native users of American Sign Language.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Hirshorn; Nina M Fernandez; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The approximate number system and domain-general abilities as predictors of math ability in children with normal hearing and hearing loss.

Authors:  Rebecca Bull; Marc Marschark; Emily Nordmann; Patricia Sapere; Wendy A Skene
Journal:  Br J Dev Psychol       Date:  2017-08-29

5.  Number processing and arithmetic skills in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Silvia Pixner; Martin Leyrer; Korbinian Moeller
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-12-16

6.  Numerical Magnitude Processing in Deaf Adolescents and Its Contribution to Arithmetical Ability.

Authors:  Lilan Chen; Yan Wang; Hongbo Wen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-25

7.  Deprivation of Auditory Experience Influences Numerosity Discrimination, but Not Numerosity Estimation.

Authors:  Alessia Tonelli; Irene Togoli; Roberto Arrighi; Monica Gori
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-01-29

8.  Small number enumeration processes of deaf or hard-of-hearing students: A study using eye tracking and artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Maike Schindler; Jan H Doderer; Anna L Simon; Erik Schaffernicht; Achim J Lilienthal; Karolin Schäfer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-22

9.  fMRI Evidence of Magnitude Manipulation during Numerical Order Processing in Congenitally Deaf Signers.

Authors:  Josefine Andin; Peter Fransson; Jerker Rönnberg; Mary Rudner
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.599

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.