Anne-Maree Kelly1, Debra Kerr, Colin Powell. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Joseph Epstein Centre for Emergency Medicine Research, Western Hospital, Private Bag, Footscray 3011, Australia. anne-maree.kelly@wh.org.au
Abstract
AIM: To determine if severity assessment after 1 h of treatment is better than assessment at presentation for predicting the requirement for hospital admission for emergency department (ED) patients with acute asthma. METHODS: Prospective, observational study conducted in 36 Australian ED for a 2-week period in 2001 involving patients aged 1-55 years presenting with asthma. Data collected included severity assessment according to the National Asthma Guidelines (Australia) at presentation and 1 h, and disposition. Descriptive analysis was applied. RESULTS: 720 cases were analysed. Patients with 'mild' asthma at either assessment time had a greater than 80% chance of discharge home. Patients assessed as 'severe' at either assessment had a greater than 85% chance of requiring hospital admission, but the 1 h assessment was better at predicting the need for Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission. For the 'moderate' group, the initial assessment was a poor predictor of the need for admission however those who met the criteria for 'moderate' severity at 1 h had an 84% chance of requiring admission. CONCLUSION: Assessment of asthma severity after 1 h of treatment is better than initial severity assessment for determining the need for hospital admission for patients initially assessed as having 'moderate' asthma and for predicting the need for ICU in patients initially assessed as 'severe'.
AIM: To determine if severity assessment after 1 h of treatment is better than assessment at presentation for predicting the requirement for hospital admission for emergency department (ED) patients with acute asthma. METHODS: Prospective, observational study conducted in 36 Australian ED for a 2-week period in 2001 involving patients aged 1-55 years presenting with asthma. Data collected included severity assessment according to the National Asthma Guidelines (Australia) at presentation and 1 h, and disposition. Descriptive analysis was applied. RESULTS: 720 cases were analysed. Patients with 'mild' asthma at either assessment time had a greater than 80% chance of discharge home. Patients assessed as 'severe' at either assessment had a greater than 85% chance of requiring hospital admission, but the 1 h assessment was better at predicting the need for Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission. For the 'moderate' group, the initial assessment was a poor predictor of the need for admission however those who met the criteria for 'moderate' severity at 1 h had an 84% chance of requiring admission. CONCLUSION: Assessment of asthma severity after 1 h of treatment is better than initial severity assessment for determining the need for hospital admission for patients initially assessed as having 'moderate' asthma and for predicting the need for ICU in patients initially assessed as 'severe'.
Authors: Chu-Lin Tsai; Ashley F Sullivan; James A Gordon; Rainu Kaushal; David J Magid; David Blumenthal; Carlos A Camargo Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2008-12-13 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Simon Craig; Franz E Babl; Stuart R Dalziel; Charmaine Gray; Colin Powell; Khalid Al Ansari; Mark D Lyttle; Damian Roland; Javier Benito; Roberto Velasco; Julia Hoeffe; Diana Moldovan; Graham Thompson; Suzanne Schuh; Joseph J Zorc; Maria Kwok; Prashant Mahajan; Michael D Johnson; Robert Sapien; Kajal Khanna; Pedro Rino; Javier Prego; Adriana Yock; Ricardo M Fernandes; Indumathy Santhanam; Baljit Cheema; Gene Ong; Shu-Ling Chong; Andis Graudins Journal: Trials Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Simon S Craig; Stuart R Dalziel; Colin Ve Powell; Andis Graudins; Franz E Babl; Carole Lunny Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2020-08-05