Literature DB >> 15303447

Unreliability of international normalized ratio for monitoring warfarin therapy in patients with lupus anticoagulant.

Terry K Rosborough1, Michele F Shepherd.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To compare the international normalized ratios (INRs) of patients positive for lupus anticoagulant and the INRs of control patients receiving warfarin therapy with equivalent therapeutic chromogenic factor X levels.
DESIGN: Prospective case series.
SETTING: A 625-bed, adult, private, tertiary care teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Sixty-eight outpatients positive for lupus anticoagulant and 57 control patients receiving long-term warfarin therapy.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Concomitant INR and chromogenic factor X activity were measured in all patients. In 44 control patients (77%) and 46 patients with lupus anticoagulant (68%), chromogenic factor X activity was 22-40% of normal, which is therapeutic. Of the 44 control patients, 4 (9%) had an INR above 3.0, and none had an INR above 4.0. In contrast, 18 (39%) of the 46 patients with lupus anticoagulant had an INR above 3.0, and 5 (11%) had an INR above 4.0.
CONCLUSION: At least 10% of patients with lupus anticoagulant receiving long-term warfarin therapy may have falsely high INR values, which could lead to inappropriate warfarin dosage reduction. Monitoring warfarin therapy by chromogenic factor X activity in patients with lupus anticoagulant avoids this INR artifact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15303447     DOI: 10.1592/phco.24.9.838.36102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  5 in total

1.  Lupus anticoagulant, warfarin, and alternative laboratory monitoring of anticoagulation.

Authors:  Siva S Ketha; Rajiv K Pruthi; Robert D McBane; Waldemar E Wysokinski
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Variability in the international normalised ratio (INR) in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and positive lupus anticoagulant: should the INR targets be higher?

Authors:  Marielena Baquero-Salamanca; Angélica María Téllez-Arévalo; Carlos Calderon-Ospina
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-04-09

Review 3.  Diagnosis and management of the antiphospholipid syndrome.

Authors:  Shruti Chaturvedi; Keith R McCrae
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2017-07-30       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 4.  The enigmas of the lupus anticoagulant: mechanisms, diagnosis, and management.

Authors:  Richard A Marlar; Sanam Husain
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.592

5.  Point of care testing to monitor INR control in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.

Authors:  Michael Masucci; Annabelle Li Kam Wa; Emilia Shingleton; Jonathan Martin; Zahra Mahir; Karen Breen
Journal:  EJHaem       Date:  2022-07-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.