Literature DB >> 15303328

Chemical signaling in a wolf spider: a test of ethospecies discrimination.

J Andrew Roberts1, George W Uetz.   

Abstract

Chemical signals from female wolf spiders that elicit exploratory behavior and courtship in males are often assumed to be species-specific, but males of some species court in response to silk cues deposited by closely related heterospecific females. Such is the case with the wolf spiders Schizocosa ocreata and S. rovneri, ethospecies reproductively isolated on the basis of differences in behavioral mechanisms during courtship. We explored whether male S. ocreata and S. rovneri reciprocally discriminate species-specific chemical or mechanical cues associated with female silk by using male behavioral response as an assay. Males were exposed to stimulus treatment categories including silk, washed silk, silk extract, and appropriate controls within conspecific or heterospecific female stimulus categories. Male S. ocreata and S. rovneri did not discriminate between conspecific or heterospecific female stimuli, and courtship intensity was greatest on untreated silk. There were no differences in latency to begin courtship or in rates of courtship behaviors attributed to species origin of silk. However, silk treatment (washed silk, extract) had a significant effect on display and exploratory behaviors (e.g., chemoexplore) in both species. Methanol extraction of female silk successfully removed or inactivated a component necessary to elicit active courtship, but extraction did not significantly reduce exploratory behavior, suggesting that a separate compound may be responsible for releasing this behavior. Together, these experiments support the characterization of S. ocreata and S. rovneri as ethospecies reproductively isolated only by female discrimination of species-specific male courtship, and indicate that chemical, but not mechanical cues associated with silk are critical for eliciting male courtship in both species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15303328     DOI: 10.1023/b:joec.0000030277.27514.92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  7 in total

1.  Multisensory cues and multimodal communication in spiders: insights from video/audio playback studies.

Authors:  George W Uetz; J Andrew Roberts
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.808

2.  Acoustic communication and reproductive isolation in two species of wolf spiders.

Authors:  G E Stratron; G W Uetz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-10-30       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Preliminary isolation of male-inhibitory pheromone of the spiderSchizocosa ocreata (Araneae, Lycosidae).

Authors:  L Rao Ayyagari; W J Tietjen
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Scorpions, spiders and solpugids: predation and competition among distantly related taxa.

Authors:  Gary A Polis; Sharon J McCormick
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Impact of intraguild predators on survival of a forest-floor wolf spider.

Authors:  David H Wise; Benrong Chen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  THE INHERITANCE OF COURTSHIP BEHAVIOR AND ITS ROLE AS A REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATING MECHANISM IN TWO SPECIES OF SCHIZOCOSA WOLF SPIDERS (ARANEAE; LYCOSIDAE).

Authors:  Gail E Stratton; George W Uetz
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Geographical variation in male courtship behaviour and sexual isolation in wolf spiders of the genus Schizocosa.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.844

  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  Nuptial gifts and sexual behavior in two species of spider (Araneae, Trechaleidae, Paratrechalea).

Authors:  Luiz Ernesto Costa-Schmidt; James Edwin Carico; Aldo Mellender de Araújo
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-04-15

Review 2.  Spider pheromones - a structural perspective.

Authors:  Stefan Schulz
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Chemical communication in Schizocosa malitiosa: evidence of a female contact sex pheromone and persistence in the field.

Authors:  Luciana Baruffaldi; Fernando G Costa; Alejandra Rodríguez; Andrés González
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Chemical Species Recognition in a Tetragnatha Spider (Araneae: Tetragnathidae).

Authors:  Seira A Adams; Moritz Gerbaulet; Stefan Schulz; Rosemary G Gillespie; Gabriele Uhl
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Chemically mediated species recognition in closely related Podarcis wall lizards.

Authors:  Diana Barbosa; Enrique Font; Ester Desfilis; Miguel A Carretero
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  A two-component female-produced pheromone of the spider Pholcus beijingensis.

Authors:  Yonghong Xiao; Jianxu Zhang; Shuqiang Li
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Chemically mediated burrow recognition in the Mexican tarantula Brachypelma vagans female.

Authors:  Ariane Dor; Salima Machkour-M'Rabet; Luc Legal; Trevor Williams; Yann Hénaut
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-08-19

Review 8.  Efficacy and safety of superficial chemical peeling in treatment of active acne vulgaris.

Authors:  Hassanain Al-Talib; Alyaa Al-Khateeb; Ayad Hameed; Chandrika Murugaiah
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.896

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.