Literature DB >> 15302754

On the dilemma of enigmatic refusal of life-saving therapy.

Katrina A Bramstedt1, Alejandro C Arroliga.   

Abstract

When patients give no reason for refusing therapy (an enigmatic refusal), this creates the dilemma of whether or not to administer the therapy by force, especially when the therapy poses low risk and offers significant benefit. We argue that there is a duty to assess the patient's decision-making capacity, as well as attempt to understand a patient's reason(s) for refusing treatment. While some patients may not readily offer reasons for refusing treatment, this does not preclude an obligation for clinicians to inquire about such. The reasons for treatment refusal can be related to the patient's goals, values, fears, and mental state.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15302754     DOI: 10.1378/chest.126.2.630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  3 in total

Review 1.  The Unbefriended Patient: An Exercise in Ethical Clinical Reasoning.

Authors:  Denise M Connor; G David Elkin; Kewchang Lee; Vanessa Thompson; Heather Whelan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Early acute management in adults with spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 3.  When psychiatry and bioethics disagree about patient decision making capacity (DMC).

Authors:  P L Schneider; K A Bramstedt
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.903

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.