Literature DB >> 15302748

Evidence-based medicine in the ICU: important advances and limitations.

Jean-Louis Vincent1.   

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is an important strategy for assessing the vast amounts of published data and applying them appropriately to our patients. However, in intensive care medicine, there is a shortage of "gold standard" randomized controlled trial evidence to support (or not support) therapeutic decisions. In addition, even when well-conducted randomized trials have been performed, we are still left with unanswered questions. In the last 5 years, several clinical trials have yielded positive results with a number of interventions being shown to improve outcomes. Here, we will outline the limitations and advances of EBM in intensive care medicine, by discussing the key findings in the last few years from studies of therapeutic agents for ICU patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15302748     DOI: 10.1378/chest.126.2.592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  13 in total

Review 1.  The difficulties of clinical trials evaluating therapeutic agents in patients with severe sepsis.

Authors:  T C Hall; D K Bilku; D Al-Leswas; C Horst; A R Dennison
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  Tidal volume reduction in patients with acute lung injury when plateau pressures are not high.

Authors:  David N Hager; Jerry A Krishnan; Douglas L Hayden; Roy G Brower
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 3.  Human recombinant protein C for severe sepsis and septic shock in adult and paediatric patients.

Authors:  Arturo J Martí-Carvajal; Ivan Solà; Christian Gluud; Dimitrios Lathyris; Andrés Felipe Cardona
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

4.  Advanced hemodynamic monitoring in intensive care medicine : A German web-based survey study.

Authors:  B Saugel; P C Reese; J Y Wagner; M Buerke; W Huber; S Kluge; R Prondzinsky
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 0.840

5.  Outcome and functional capacity after prolonged intensive care unit stay.

Authors:  Georg Delle Karth; Brigitte Meyer; Sabine Bauer; Mariam Nikfardjam; Gottfried Heinz
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 6.  Consent models in Canadian critical care randomized controlled trials: a scoping review.

Authors:  Katie O'Hearn; Jess Gibson; Karla Krewulak; Rebecca Porteous; Victoria Saigle; Margaret Sampson; Anne Tsampalieros; Nick Barrowman; Saoirse Cameron
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 6.713

7.  Promoting Global Research Excellence in Severe Sepsis (PROGRESS): lessons from an international sepsis registry.

Authors:  R Beale; K Reinhart; F M Brunkhorst; G Dobb; M Levy; G Martin; C Martin; G Ramsey; E Silva; B Vallet; J-L Vincent; J M Janes; S Sarwat; M D Williams
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.553

8.  Comparison of Charlson comorbidity index with SAPS and APACHE scores for prediction of mortality following intensive care.

Authors:  Steffen Christensen; Martin Berg Johansen; Christian Fynbo Christiansen; Reinhold Jensen; Stanley Lemeshow
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 4.790

9.  Is the current management of severe sepsis and septic shock really evidence based?

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 10.  Effect of parenteral selenium supplementation in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ting-Shuo Huang; Yu-Chiau Shyu; Huang-Yang Chen; Li-Mei Lin; Chia-Ying Lo; Shin-Sheng Yuan; Pei-Jer Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.